
<?phpxml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
<title>Sphinn / WebGeek / Hot Today</title>
<link>http://sphinn.com</link>
<description>Sphinn</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:00:08 -0700</pubDate>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Matt McGee: Twittering for Charity]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/43479</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/43479</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:00:08 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Water Cooler</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/43479</guid>
<description><![CDATA[If you follow me on Twitter, you'll be helping to raise money for a good cause. Please follow me, then come back to read on for more detailsa4..<br/><br/>46 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Say No to Technoratia4s Forced Upgrades - Bad Information Spreads Like Wildfire]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/40009</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/40009</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:29:56 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Blogging</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/40009</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I have to strongly disagree with Technorati's recent forced upgrades. I dislike strong-arming tactics like this, and think it's dangerous, for several reasons. At the risk of voicing a potentially unpopular opinion, I feel strongly that this needs to be said.<br/><br/>43 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft to Yahoo - 3 Weeks and Counting]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/39000</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/39000</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:01:08 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Yahoo</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/39000</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Apparently the line has been drawn in the sand by Microsoft's Steve Balmer in a letter sent to Yahoo today.  That line is three weeks to see some kind of progress in Microsoft's bid to take over Yahoo!<br/><br/>34 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why Search Marketing Standards are a Bad Idea]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/39350</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/39350</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 11:58:16 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>SEM Industry</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/39350</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The biggest problem with SEO standards is we'll get some half baked, half assed, implementation that's just as bad as the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). As a concept it's seems like a wonderful idea, everyone agrees to a set of established teachings and has to meet a minimum set of standards. Should enable customers to do apples to apples comparisons and eliminate con artists and shiesters, right? Wrong my naive and misguided friends, what we end up with is a big fat goopy mess.<br/><br/>44 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
