
<?phpxml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
<title>Sphinn / granolajoe / Voted News</title>
<link>http://sphinn.com</link>
<description>Sphinn</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 10:59:44 -0700</pubDate>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why Your Old Media Reputation Matters More]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/49082</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/49082</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 10:59:44 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>News Sites</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/49082</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The impact of an old media paper article far exceeds that of an Internet article. There is something about old media that we retain for a long time which is not true of new media, and this may explain why people like Tom Friedman are still not blogging. As a consequence an old media reputation, whether good or bad, is deeper and longer lasting.<br/><br/>3 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
