
<?phpxml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
<title>Sphinn / graywolf / Commented News</title>
<link>http://sphinn.com</link>
<description>Sphinn</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 06:26:28 -0700</pubDate>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Example of How to get KW Rich Links With Social Media]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/64367</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/64367</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 06:26:28 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Social Media</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/64367</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Most business owners and website publisher still look at social media with short term goals. They are willing to invest the time and energy but are still looking for direct sales. As a result the editorial tone of the piece takes a different angle, is less useful, and ultimately generates less links.Here's an example of an exceptional piece that is well written, and resource rich without being salesy. Do you think it will generate more links with the KWD's &quot;business cards&quot; than one concerned with selling?<br/><br/>14 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google kills Anti Scientology "Anonymous" AdSense Account]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/46421</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/46421</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 09:57:54 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google AdSense</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/46421</guid>
<description><![CDATA[According to Google: &quot;While going through our records recently, we found that your AdSense account has posed a significant risk to our AdWords advertisers&quot; Kinda Funny when google chooses the ads to be sold.Google has also killed several anti Scientology youtube channels but leaves the Scientology channel intacthttp://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/02/youtube_scientology_channel/<br/><br/>16 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sphinn Community - Who's the Best Star Trek Captain?]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/32272</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/32272</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 06:22:16 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Water Cooler</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/32272</guid>
<description><![CDATA[At the Google Groove during SMX several of the Sphinn moderators and admins got into a heated debate about an important question, who's the best Star Trek Captain, Kirk or Picard?I'm an old school guy  with a &quot;damn the torpedoes full speed ahead&quot; approach, so it's obvious I'm a fan of the classic Trek and Captain Kirk. However Picard really seems to have captured the hearts of many of the other Sphinn administration. So in a completely un-scientific and non structured way, voice your opinion below.PS: Someone came by and made the suggestion of Janeway, but I'm guessing that had more to do with the alcohol than anything else, and since Sisco came is a LT and was only promoted mid series run, he totally doesn't count ;-)<br/><br/>42 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Perez Hilton in Catfight With Google's YouTube]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/19965</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/19965</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 05:48:50 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Other</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/19965</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Nevertheless, Hilton expressed anger at YouTube for sending him a standard, generic e-mail informing him of his account's violation and temporary shutdown. Don't they know who he is? They should, his YouTube videos generate millions of views, according to him. Doesn't he rate at least a phone call? In his farewell video, Hilton tells his fans he probably won't be posting any more videos to YouTube and that neither should they. Dis.The automated solutions of viacom and YouTube backfired on both of them, starting a very nasty, very public dispute.<br/><br/>37 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google Plans to Open Social Data November 5th]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/6472</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/6472</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:04:15 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/6472</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Google's goal - to fight Facebook by being even more open than the Facebook Platform. If Facebook is 98% open, Google wants to be 100%.The short version: Google will announce a new set of APIs on November 5 that will allow developers to leverage Google's social graph data. They'll start with Orkut and iGoogle (Google's personalized home page), and expand from there to include Gmail, Google Talk and other Google services over time.<br/><br/>37 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Fresh Beets and A&P Supermarket - How to Bring Unwanted Attention to a Problem]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/4579</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/4579</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 10:31:00 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Social Media</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/4579</guid>
<description><![CDATA[In an age of social media and user generated content, sending in the lawyers first isn't always the smartest thing to do, in fact sometimes it blows up in your face, bringing more attention to a bad situation.<br/><br/>8 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
