
<?phpxml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
<title>Sphinn / janecopland / Hot Today</title>
<link>http://sphinn.com</link>
<description>Sphinn</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:45:43 -0700</pubDate>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[SEO University: Should Academia Be Our Standard?]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/77748</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/77748</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:45:43 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>SEM Industry</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/77748</guid>
<description><![CDATA[There are interesting pros and significant cons to incorporating SEO into universities and developing degree programmes based on the subject. Somehow, my disadvantages list got a bit longer than the advantages one...<br/><br/>38 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[SEO vs Tynt: Storm In A Tea Cup 2.0?]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/73597</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/73597</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 04:12:03 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Other Online Marketing</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/73597</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Remember that site that launched not long ago to SEO-furor over stolen content? Ciarn writes: &quot;I'm sure that for lots of people the idea of being able to graffiti a website is the most fun they'll have with their clothes on, [but] I can't help wondering whether, with the financial world in a state of severe trauma, worrying about web 2.0 startups is a bit like fretting about a mosquito bite whilst a shark nibbles at your ankles.<br/><br/>44 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Comparing Search Engine Performance: How does Cuil Stack Up to Google, Yahoo!, Live & Ask]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/62342</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/62342</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 04:05:46 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Other Searching</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/62342</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Rand pits Cuil against today's leading search engines to determine which, overall, is the best. The results weren't as predictable as he'd thought they would be.<br/><br/>42 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Facebook Disables Yet Another Account For No Good Reason]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/58718</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/58718</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 06:38:55 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Networking</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/58718</guid>
<description><![CDATA[It's becoming a far more common story: legitimate Facebook users attempting to log in to their accounts and being greeted by a notice that the accounts have been disabled. Tony Adam documents his frustrating experience with Facebook and asks why the social networking giant keeps doing this.<br/><br/>54 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Indexing Search Results: Why Google Is Going Against Its Own Advice]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/44359</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/44359</comments>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 13:34:51 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google Searching</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/44359</guid>
<description><![CDATA[It now seems that Google is ignoring its own advice, and the use of noindex, and is indexing search results pages. If you look at Computer Weekly's robots.txt file, you'll see their search pages are noindexed. And yet the pages have been indexed.<br/><br/>48 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Holy Mother of Linkbait]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/42574</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/42574</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 04:38:33 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google Searching</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/42574</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Rand and I posted a relatively amusing piece of linkbait on Tuesday night. Little did we realise that we were about to take over the top ten most searched for phrases at Google.<br/><br/>93 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sorry Andy, Youa4re Wrong: Google a4Search Within A Sitea4 Is A Big Deal]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/36496</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/36496</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 06:22:04 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google Searching</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/36496</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Andy Beal thinks that The New York Time is over-reacting with its article questioning the new move; however, he seems to be overlooking some serious implications of Google's &quot;Search within a site&quot; feature.<br/><br/>55 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Rand Fishkin and Mike McDonald Should Watch Their Language]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/32864</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/32864</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 00:38:16 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Water Cooler</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/32864</guid>
<description><![CDATA[He sometimes goes off like this at the office, too. It's a task to get in all the beeps, though.<br/><br/>50 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
