
<?phpxml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
<title>Sphinn / jmaulson / All</title>
<link>http://sphinn.com</link>
<description>Sphinn</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 00:52:01 -0700</pubDate>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Commission Junction - Settlement Website - CJ Lawsuit]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/63132</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/63132</comments>
<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 00:52:01 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Affiliate Marketing</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/63132</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The plaintiffs in this lawsuit are two current and former members of the Commission Junction (&quot;CJ&quot;) Network who entered into either a publisher service agreement (&quot;Publishers&quot;) or an advertiser service agreement (&quot;Advertisers&quot;) with the defendants. They contend that the defendants did not do enough to monitor the CJ Network for the use by third-parties of software programs that do not comply with CJ's Publisher Code of Conduct and are intended to steal or divert commissions from Publishers and Advertisers on CJ's Network (&quot;Non-Compliant Software&quot;) or to monitor for or prevent third parties from engaging in the theft or &quot;hijacking&quot; of commissions from Advertisers and Publishers on CJ's Network. They further contend that the Defendants failed to make sufficient disclosures regarding the existence of such Non-Compliant Software and commission theft, resulting in losses to both Advertisers and Publishers on CJ's Network. As a result, the plaintiffs believe both Advertisers and Publishers suffered losses on the CJ Network.<br/><br/>2 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Search Behavior: I Know What I Want but Not Where to Find It]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/61392</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/61392</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:33:04 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Other Search Marketing</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/61392</guid>
<description><![CDATA[&quot;If we find a rich patch, we file it away for future consideration. This is another area where information foraging diverges from biological foraging. Looking for food is a zero sum game. If we don't eat the food we find, someone else will. So when we find a rich patch, we stay put until we eat as much as we can (or until a richer patch beckons). But online, information is not really consumed.&quot;<br/><br/>3 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[ncldr.com  - Social Media at its Best]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/40665</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/40665</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:34:16 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Networking</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/40665</guid>
<description><![CDATA[From the site: Tired of only having 60, 100, 200 friends? ncldr is the most awesomest ultimate social network ever.Sounds all inclusive :)<br/><br/>2 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Eco.org being auctioned]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/34118</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/34118</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:55:08 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Domaining</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/34118</guid>
<description><![CDATA[&quot;We think the domain name is worth $100,000 to $200,000,&quot; said Warren E. Agin, head of Swiggart &amp; Agin, LLC's bankruptcy department, &quot;but we really don't know what the domain name will sell for at auction.&quot; The company's bankruptcy papers listed the value of the domain name as &quot;unknown.&quot;How much do you guys think it is really worth? For the right people?<br/><br/>3 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
