
<?phpxml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
<title>Sphinn / samcasuncad / Saved News</title>
<link>http://sphinn.com</link>
<description>Sphinn</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sphinn Bar Argument: Why I Don't Approve Questioning Quality Over Responsibility]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/89625</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/89625</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:09:38 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Sphinn Zone</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/89625</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Are you responsible for all your Sphinns? If so, then why the need to raise the bar? Would questioning quality of posts in the home page be enough reason rather than a call for responsibility? Will this be a good move for quality or quantity? Read my post.<br/><br/>5 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ranking is Dead Says Bruce Clay, Matt Cutts Comments]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/86697</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/86697</comments>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:14:04 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/86697</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Armed with SEO knowledge, we all thought that the search trends will not change but as Google sees big possibilities in many angles, nobody can tell what the next few months will bring SEOs in the internet battle for rankings. This is a post on whether search rankings will die according to the 2 separate video interviews with Bruce Clay in his presentation of &quot;ranking is dead&quot; and Matt Cutts own version and explanation of it.<br/><br/>4 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
