
<?phpxml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
<title>Sphinn / smcandrew / All</title>
<link>http://sphinn.com</link>
<description>Sphinn</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:21:38 -0700</pubDate>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Use Comment Luv for More Comments - Give Your Visitors a Link]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/58277</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/58277</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:21:38 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Link Building</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/58277</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Kay writes about a cool WordPress plug-in which automatically posts a link to a commenters most recent blog post (if they have a blog).<br/><br/>4 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[SEO and Flash - Using Div Tags for Content]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/14187</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/14187</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:12:40 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/14187</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Interesting article. I personally think that the BLITZ solution is elegant and it does appear as if it should be in compliance.  But - is it not being penalized because it is compliant, or because Google hasn't realized the Flash replacement technique that is being used?  That is the question.  Google has indicated that sIFR (also a replacement technique of raw HTML with Flash) is a technique that it is acceptable.  What Kay is describing (and what BLITZ has done) is the EXACT some technique--it just involves more content * and * has the &quot;L&quot; word involved -- LINKS.   One final word--I wish Google had figured out how to asses sites built in this way as it is the only way to provide a rich media experience what is also ACCESSIBLE.<br/><br/>4 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
