
<?phpxml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
<channel>
<title>Sphinn / webuildpages / Voted News</title>
<link>http://sphinn.com</link>
<description>Sphinn</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:31:05 -0700</pubDate>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Does your #1 ranking meet users intent? (if not, you may lose it).]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/65290</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/65290</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:31:05 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Google SEO</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/65290</guid>
<description><![CDATA[QualityGal (of We Build Pages), &quot;It's hard to tell someone - like your boss, or a client - that their keyword targeting campaign is due to fail miserably because it doesn't match up with user intent.&quot;<br/><br/>9 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Link Buying: Reviewed and not Guaranteed is the line in the sand.]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/24523</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/24523</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:48:51 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Link Building</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/24523</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I hate beating a dead horse, but I think it's all in our best interest to try to understand where are the lines that have been drawn when it comes to purchasing links. I reference comments from Matt about paying for a Yahoo Directory listings to show the line.<br/><br/>60 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Boykin's "The Linker "- done to "The Gambler "]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/22198</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/22198</comments>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 09:39:47 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Link Building</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/22198</guid>
<description><![CDATA[On a cold winterss evenin at a Pubcon in Vegas, I met up with the Linker; we were both too tired to sleep........You got to know when to link em, know when to bait em,Know when Matt's talking FUD, And when he's holding a gun.You never count your backlinks or get hung up on Pagerank.There'll be time enough for countin when you're number 1.<br/><br/>33 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[How Not To Be Seen By Google]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/19314</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/19314</comments>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:12:41 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Link Building</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/19314</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I about died laughing my a** off at this. If you care about link building, and you like Monty Python, and you love a great laugh, then check this out!<br/><br/>9 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google Doesn't Penalize your Rankings if you Sell Links! - by Jim Boykin]]></title>
<link>http://sphinn.com/story/7419</link>
<comments>http://sphinn.com/story/7419</comments>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:39:29 -0700</pubDate>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<category>Link Building</category>
<guid>http://sphinn.com/story/7419</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A few days ago the Cool Aid and FUD was passed around here about a site that was penalized in rankings because they sold a few links. Jim believes Google doesn't, nor ever will, penalize sites for selling links. Find out why!<br/><br/>119 Vote(s) ]]></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
