Published: Feb 24, 2009 - 09:58 am
Story Found By: NickWilsdon 1082 Days ago
Category: SEM
5 Comments
5 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Comments disabled there so:Blogs, twitter and FB arent convos, by themselves, thats true. But they enable convos. Having your own expensive platform inhouse to host the cnvo isnt necessary. Then only big corps would be conversant. Ironically, especially offline (part f the Cluetrain inspiration), SMBs converse most with their clients.
I agree that those tools enable conversations but that doesnt mean that the things that happen on them (when brands are involved) actually are conversations. Ive got two legs which should, in theory, enable me to run 100m in 10 seconds. But i cant & dont. I think my main gripe is that most of the time that brands/agencies use the word, what they mean is "We would like to think that consumers really care about what we are saying and want to respond". But most of the time thats simply not the case and we know it.Like I say in the post, I realise that there are conversations between people & brands, but not very often.
Great take on it Ciaran,I worked with a creative agency several years ago who pitched (successfully!!) that a flash social space where prospective customers could add one of 5 little Mii-style characters and a short message was good value for over £20k and would enable some viral to spreadUntil they were asked why on earth anyone would do it....I never cease to be astonished by the field-of-dreams mentality, that putting something on a new channel constitues leveraging, interacting or in any way contributing to it.
Im going to play devils advocate. Most businesses put up a venue for communication: blog, forum, whatever. That puts the ball in the customers court. And...well... no one cares. It probably is not the companies fault that the conversation isnt happening. Like your quote from Danny Sullivan points out-- we dont want to talk about artificial sweetener (your business).Just because we ignore business communications doesnt make them less earnest.Also, good post.
Perhaps my company doesnt fall into the Web "conversation" scenario because we dont sell stuff that customers buy in volume. Nor stuff for which wed set up a public support venue to enable clients to discuss their wants/issues/needs. If clients want to talk to us, we use email and the phone -- now theres a conversation, and better yet for the fact that its private.There IS a need for private communications for many businesses. Imagine one of your clients wanting to discuss market trends with respect to his business ... online, where everyone can read it. Imagine posting your responses online.However, a public support "conversation" area does work where its needed, if its handled correctly and if the public uses it.Still, the use of the word "conversation" has always made me grit my teeth. Its not as if omitting to provide a public discussion area means a company is out of communication with its customers. It just doesnt work for all scenarios.