Published: Mar 12, 2009 - 02:00 pm
Story Found By: gyutae 1066 Days ago
Category: SEM
6 Comments
6 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
As I commented on the post: I very much agree with the thrust of this article. However I don’t see them as direct competitors. They are each dealing with very different online Webs. Twitter will clearly not try to out-google Google. Equally Google should not try to out-twitter Twitter. Google’s most successful mission in business terms would be to focus, focus, focus on its Universal Web Search and forget trying to catalogue all knowledge in the universe. The latter is just a macho appetite for size at whatever cost.
Could not disagree more, and here are 6 reasons (and a lot of discussion in comments) why its not:http://sphinn.com/story/104244
You lost me at "Google returns pretty good search results most of the time, but they’re impersonal and sometimes irrelevant to what you really want"I seriously doubt, Twitter will come to the market place with a serious search product that would come close to Google.
What Barry said. Twitter is a complimentary search experience to Google but it is no way the future and will never replace it.
*** I seriously doubt, Twitter will come to the market place with a serious search product that would come close to Google. ***Its not that Twitter will make a better search product, but simply that asking something on Twitter and getting live answers back from the cloud can (for some types of information) give a better experience than wading through SERPs at Google or other SEs.
From the blog comments:Do me a favor: Go to search.twitter.com and search for ‘dallas hotel’ I don’t know about you, but I’m not seeing anything that resembles a recommendation, save for a clear shill site.Do the same for ‘dallas restaurant’. ‘Movie review’. ‘How I Met Your Mother.’ All things that weve heard from pundits and twitter fanatics are the kinds of searches that will clearly drive traffic away from Google. And the noise is only going to get more intense as more people - and spammers - join Twitter.I would say that in terms of search, Twitter could be a Yahoo Answers or TripAdvisor (neither of which is a great threat to Google or its search traffic), which follow the human-generated recommendation description that you favor - but even that’s a stretch because at 140 characaters, even the best of search algorithms aren’t going to be able to do much to determine what a post is about and how it relates to your query. It’s a broadcast instant message platform, not a place where people go to strictly dole out useful and helpful information in order to answer specific questions.It could very easily change our lives, but not in any likelyhood our search - and certainly not in its current form. A supplement for universal search like images, video and blogs at absolute most.