Story Found By: Receptional 1031 Days ago
Category: Link Building
7 Comments
7 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Definitely worth a Sphinn - nice post Dixon. Wondering about yuor thoughts on the SEOmoz metrics as a comparison?
Linkscape looks prettier :)In terms of raw data, the sources Ive used are much stronger - but wielding such data needs one heck of a disciplined mind! (So I have Barrie for that, otherwise I try to cut corners).In terms of the analysis, we get the same conclusion on Linkscape:Evilgreenmonkey gets a mozrank of 4.49, from 108 domainsDixonjones gets a mozrank of 4.31, from 23 domainsJanecopland (as with some of my data) is too new to rank.So whichever way you dice it, you get to the same conclusion... Although Jane commented that its just because shes a black hat... so "bait and switch" comes to mind :)
So let me get this straight: TBPR is deceiving because1) EGM has more links than Jane but has lower TBPR2) EGM has more root domain links than JaneWow.. Sure TBPR is inaccurate but those reasons arent why. First of all internal PageRank isnt just about number of links. PageRank is calculated by looking at both the quality and quantity of links. Thats SEO 101. So who the fuck cares if EGM has more links? The same argument applies to root domain links. Google doesnt calculate PageRank by just counting the number of root domain links to EGMs site.Lets take page A and page B of equal raw PageRank. Page As got 1000 unique links on it and links to EGM. Page Bs got 10 unique links on it and links to Jane. Lets say both are root domain links. Who do you think will end up with more link juice?
Hmm. Ok - thanks for the colourful language, Halfdeck, but Im not sure you read the post. Looking at the snippet at the top, Sphinn ssems to have dropped the "not equal to" symbol between the words "Links" and "Little Green Bar".<div><div>The article says ToolBar PageRank is not all about the number of links. Thats what you reiterated in your comment.<div><div></div><div></div></div></div></div>
"The article says ToolBar PageRank is not all about the number of links."Let me re-read the title. Oh ok. The post title says "Why the PageRank Toolbar has Little to Do with Links" followed by "Everyone assumes that green line is all to do with backlinks. Rubbish."That *kinda* reads like "why TBPR is all about backlinks but not about the NUMBER of backlinks." I get it now. Thanks for the clarification.
no probs. I can cope with being shouted at for being wrong through... I often am :)I made the Sphinn snippet clearer too.
Why write about TBPR if you have no clue what youre talking about