Published: Oct 26, 2007 - 01:15 pm
Story Found By: RobertClough 1669 Days ago
Category: SEO
3 Comments
3 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
I know a few, which is what prompted my article. One of my friends whos a webmaster - no clue about SEO, read the article on Forbes and decided to poke around for Googles clarification on nofollow. He went to the guidelines and found nothing and said to me... "WTF!!? how do i find out info on this stuff Googles knocking sites for, if they dont have it in their guidlines?!". I decided to dig a little and thats what prompted the blog post.Were so insulated in our "search world" most of the time we take for granted everyone will know about this kind of stuff, when they dont, then they assume something wrong and thats how misinformation is born. People go to those guideline pages and TOS pages and about pages to find more information about something they "heard" or "got from a source". Especially technical types that dont know about search - let alone nofollow.
Hear Hear! I actually started a blog post about this very subject 48 hours ago and it morphed into an article which Im waiting for SiteProNews to publish. I think its about time for Google to be more transparent about their algorithm-related activities. If this PR adjustment is merely a reflection of a new PR benchmark, then why not announce that? Putting the NoFollow stuff in their Webmaster Guidelines would be a good start. Ive had to track down info about it on Matt Cutts blog when trying to point people to it. I have loads of clients and blog readers who read the guidelines and follow them religiously, so why not there? Or what about putting information like this into their Webmaster Tools login area where more webmasters are going to see it? Heck, whats wrong with a press release? Webmasters might not know to look at the guidelines but they read newspapers.
Rankings, or PageRank?