Published: Nov 08, 2007 - 09:43 am
Story Found By: onreact 1557 Days ago
Category: SEM
14 Comments
14 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
I wonder if Tor anonymous proxy is backed by Microsoft, CIA, or NSA, for anonymous data harvesting?
Nice spin."It turns out that the ISP gave the police the wrong information" "So what are the lessons to learn from this incident?Given that Mr. Kailash didnt actually post the photos, I cant provide him with any advice for protecting his privacy on the Internet. All I can suggest is that he hire a very good lawyer, and attempt to take Airtel to the cleaners."Question is should Google be snitching on people who break inane laws?http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:HR04780:@@@D&summ2=m&"Global Online Freedom Act of 2006 - States that it is the policy of the United States to: (1) promote the ability of all to access and contribute information, ideas, and knowledge via the Internet; (2) use all instruments of U.S. influence, including diplomacy, trade policy, and export controls, to support, promote, and strengthen the free flow of information; and (3) prohibit any U.S. business from cooperating with officials of Internet-restricting countries in effecting potential censorship of online content."
Google is looking out for its own ass. It wants the eye balls, not the hearts!
The bottom line is: Corporations, even nice and friendly ones like Google allegedly is do not care for you or other people, least to say about democracy. If its profitable theyll work together with any regime, like Google does in China and other countries where it supports local censorship laws.
The sad reality is that we are going to keep hearing about this kind of stuff as the years pass and the internet becomes a more and more important aspect of the world and everyday life in general.
Really, corporations should not cooperate with goverment thugs- if the information was used to find a rapist or murderer or kidnapper, then I would have some sympathy with the company giving it out. But hwne the government is just out ot violate peoples rights (which really, is a redundant statement- as thats pretty much all governments do) then the company should be held accountable.It doesnt matter that tehy gave out the wrong infromation- giving out the right information would be just as much a crime in this case.
This is a story about an incompetent ISP, not Google, but thanks for playing.You can end up in jail doing something illegal in your country which has nothing to do with Google except one of their properties was the place where the illegal act was committed and they were required by law to divulge the source.All the anti-Google hysteria around this post is silly.FWIW, the title and post in Sphinn are libelous as the CNN story didnt actually accuse Google of any wrong doing but this post does.Grab your ankles...
>This is a story about an incompetent ISP, not GoogleExactly! A title edit is in order here.
but then it wouldnt be such a juicy link to click on!
"but then it wouldnt be such a juicy link to click on!"Yeah, but then after I click Im forced to put onreat in my leg-pulling, wolf-cryin, unreliable link baiter basket with the credibility score of -1000.
This is a story about Google giving away data about someone who was guilty of the crime of free speech. If you guys dont care, move to China or something, youll like it there!On a side note: Read the whole article to grasp Googles role here and the issue at stake and dont offend me. Especially if youre a 3rd rate Sphinn user I never have heard of.
"Especially if youre a 3rd rate Sphinn user I never have heard of."Lol, who are you calling a 3rd rate Sphinn user?"This is a story about Google giving away data about someone who was guilty of the crime of free speech. If you guys dont care, move to China or something, youll like it there!"This is a story about an ISP giving the wrong information to the authorities. And no, I dont give a shit. Youre free to manufacture your own version of reality but dont expect everyone to fall for it. We may not all be PHDs, but were not stupid.
By the way, in the US, its a crime in some states to burn the American flag, though the US Supreme court says flag burning is protected under the First Amendment.For example, a teenager in Tenessee was jailed for 9 days for burning the flaghttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8587596/Yalies accused of flag burningWhat does this mean?1) Freedom of speech is not unlimited.2) Every country has a limit to free speech.3) The severey of limitation on free speech depends on each country.You cannot argue that jailing someone for exercising his freedom of speech is wrong. It depends on what was said. Therefore you also cannot conclude that Google is wrong for complying with the Indian authorities, unless youre conceited enough to believe you know better than the government of India.
"Read the whole article to grasp Googles role here and the issue at stake and dont offend me."OK, pay attention in class.Google did what was required by law and then the ISP sent the wrong personal info that ended up sending the wrong person to jail, not Google. So then you decided to libel Google with your incorrect interpretation of the facts just for link bait and expect people not to offend you for being wrong in so many ways?LMAO