Sphinn Home » Sphinn Zone
Nofollow removed from links in Sphinn comments?
Just noticed links in Sphinn comments are no longer nofollowed. Apologies if this has already been mentioned, I haven't been browsing much during the week.

When did this get put into place, and is it permanent?

Is it actually a good idea? I noticed it because I saw a comment where someone put in a sort of "signature" with a link to his site.

Seems to me that comment links is actually what nofollow is for, as opposed to paid links that Google would now like them to be for!
9 Comments     

Comments

from blavish 603 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

I think it is a good idea but I guess there will be more spam now.

from nyirendac 603 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

Good development. Better ways to fight spam must be used.I have always argued than nofollow is not a good way of fighting spam.

from SamFreedom 603 days ago # - show/hide this comment
Votes: -1 | Vote:
+ -

Nofollow was never meant to fight spam.  Do you mean to tell me that the brilliant minds that invented things like Google couldn't have found a less Fascist way to combat SPAM than to slap juice dams on everyone's blogs without their permission? lol, seriously... 

I'm actually ok with the Patriot Act but those who aren't don't see it as for fighting terrorism just like I don't see NoFollow was ever for fighting SPAM but for CONTROL... for making their algorithms more stable and search results more accurate and predictable.

Noble cause but by slapping tags on everyone's blogs without even asking?

from Jill 602 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

Well, they're back to being nofollowed tonight...so not sure what that was all about...

from theGypsy 602 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

Sam... I think what they meant was it would be more likely to be Spammed ... he he

from jonathan 601 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

Sam,

Quite the opposite though.  Google stated that nofollow was created in 2005 for the sole purpose of fighting spam.

from Spitman 601 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

Ah but Jonathan, surely we all know by now that what Google 'state' and what Google 'actually mean/intend' are often two entirely different things ;)

from lasellers 601 days ago #
Votes: 1 | Vote:
+ -

(Personally I'm at the point I'd like to give making a completely open (and open source) search engine a go. But maybe that's not something I should say in public. :) )

from dannysullivan 601 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

Debate aside, we iindeed put nofollow on to help fight spam, and it is supposed to be showing. I see it come and go, myself, Jill. I'll get someone to check on it.


Log in to comment or register here.

Sphinn Sponsors

Be a Sphinn Sponsor - Click Here

Search Marketing Expo

Save the date for:
SMX Singapore - July 2-3, 2009
SMX São Paulo - August 4-5
SMX East - October 5-7, 2009
SMX Stockholm - 12-13 October, 2009
SMX Mexico - November 11, 2009

Search Marketing Now

Learn more about search marketing through free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site Search Marketing Now.

Upcoming Webcasts: