Sphinn Home » Google
If a review requires disclosure and you want to avoid the Wrath of Google, maybe putting “sponsored review” in an image is so much smarter.

Or not...
6 Comments     

Comments

from qwerty 318 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

Aside from the magic of OCR, one should note that an image containing the words "sponsored review" really ought to have an alt attribute of "sponsored review."

from Ruud 318 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

Yes... and the links in the sponsored review should be nofollow... Kinda defeats the purpose of hiding something in an image though :)

from garyprice 316 days ago #
Votes: 1 | Vote:
+ -

On a related note, a wonderful web organizer, Evernote, allows you to take cameraphone pics or clip images from web sites and then search them using OCR


Back in 2005, Chris wrote a very positive review of the service for SEW.
.

from samantha85 315 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

That duplicate image detection idea is something cool.

from neyne 290 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

if you are not going to disclose it and even try to hide it, why bother in the first place ?

from AndyBeard 289 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

I live in Europe - I have to think about accessibility


Log in to comment or register here.
Search Marketing Expo

Save the date for:
SMX East (New York City) - Oct. 6-8: See the agenda or register today and save!
SMX London - Nov. 4-5: Pre-agenda rate now available. Click here.
SMX West - Feb. 10-12

Search Marketing Now

Learn more about search marketing through free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site Search Marketing Now.

Upcoming Webcasts: