Published: Nov 27, 2007 - 08:29 am
Story Found By: DoshDosh 1539 Days ago
Category: Social Media
10 Comments
10 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Sounds like someone is a little too dependent on certain kinds of advertising. Yeah they dont click as well from SOME social sites, especially Digg, but killing off all that traffic is something only someone who is totally dependent on Google would do.
LOL. ""Its my ball, and as you wont play with me, Im taking it away. Waaaahhhhhhhhhh!!!!"" Interesting concept: Click on my ads or you cant read my website.
Looks like another rather whacky linkbait job to me. Not that they are entirely wrong in terms of Digg and most others, but blanket statements (and measures) like that do reek of attention whoring.
Youd think hed put some ads on the block page...
Bandwidth theft? They are visitors, why not make it a member only website and make everyone sign in before continuing? Why dont they go to digg and ask to disallow any diggs from their URL or build a crappier website that will entice users to leave it for a Google AdSense ad?
Anybody else read the bottom part of this? http://whydiggisblocked.com/response.html
LOL... cant wait till next week... I <em>love</em> serial fiction! The best part was the bit about <a href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?id=1005408">social media users being small in terms of online spending</a>. Somebody wanna ring up eMarketer and let them in on that interesting non-statistic?
While I dont agree with this route, I do agree that people that use ad blockers should have content blocked for them. The reality is websites have to function somehow and running an ad blocker is essentially liking stealing.
OK, this article is stupid because it focuses on a group of users and a specific browser which is just wrong. Ive went into in detail on Why Firefox is Misguidely Blocked about 2 months ago. FWIW, if youre running an AdSense site and block people telling them you cant come in because you dont click the ads is probably against the rules because when they get in they might just click the ads to gain access which is click fraud. Too much click fraud, aka BOUNCE, and youll probably get banned from AdSense.If you must stop them from downloading, detect when things are being blocked and just say "Access Denied due to blocking of complete content displayed from this site" or something that doesnt point at the advertising directly.
Funny stuff. Im amazed that they have the time to focus on that strategy. "we suggest stopping using social media sites and finding the resources through Google instead."Sounds like a spinnmaster from a PAC...Also the term "resources" should actually mean CONTENT, not advertising...IMHO, sites filled with advertising are simply not that "resourceful".