- 32
- Sphinn It!
Posted By: EstebanPanzera 581 days ago
Topic Type: News Story (Jump to http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com)
Category: Google Other
8 Comments
8 Comments
Save the date for:
SMX Singapore - July 2-3, 2009
SMX São Paulo - August 4-5
SMX East - October 5-7, 2009
SMX Stockholm - 12-13 October, 2009
SMX Mexico - November 11, 2009
Learn more about search marketing through free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site Search Marketing Now.
Comments
Quick find, Esteban! I also walked through a real-world example on my personal blog to show why search engines would rather not be affected by links in paid posts:
http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/selling-links-that-pass-pagerank/
Excellent! Official confirmation of many unsubstantiated reports.
Disclosure is good. But I think the argument was flimsy and I've posted a comment at http://sphinn.com/story/16720 and on the GG Groups thread as to why
As Kalena mentioned, most of the Sphinn discussion is over at http://sphinn.com/story/16720
matt, thanks for blowing this issue wide open again. the comments on these two sphinn topics and the official google blog are fantastic record of the numerous instances where this policy is not working. it tickles me that google is actually hosting some of them.
hmm looks like coordinated fighter pilot and wingman approach to me, having used it myself on more than one occasion
graywolf, who would be the fighter and the wingman in your view of this thread? I know I'm flying solo, so I'm not sure who you're talking about..
I'm talking about using two seperate domains for slightly different messages under a single umbrella theme and concept.
For those watching at home it allows you to tailor content specifically to better match the audience. Example Conde Nast publishes "W", Vogue, Style, Allure magazines. They often have similar overlapping content but cater to slightly different audiences. Example 2 NBC and CNBC often cover identical stories but with a slightly different focus or emphasis. Only very very rarely will you see a radical divergance in editorial slant.