- 42
- Sphinn It!
Posted By: gyutae 576 days ago
Topic Type: News Story (Jump to http://searchengineland.com)
Category: Google SEO
12 Comments
12 Comments
Save the date for:
SMX Singapore - July 2-3, 2009
SMX São Paulo - August 4-5
SMX East - October 5-7, 2009
SMX Stockholm - 12-13 October, 2009
SMX Mexico - November 11, 2009
Learn more about search marketing through free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site Search Marketing Now.
Comments
Why do I get the feeling that this will apply to everyone BUT Google?
I bet your totally right SEF
I think everyone has extrapolated far too much from what was actually said.
Matt has said he will clarify this in the next few weeks.
Here's what Matt Cutts said on SER regarding this:
"This isn't a correct characterization of what Google is looking at doing. What I was trying to say is that in some circumstances, Google may move closer to treating subdomains as we do with subdirectories. I'll talk about this more at some point after I get back from PubCon."
Clarification to be coming in WebProNews PubCon video with Matt:
http://videos.webpronews.com/tag/pubcon
Matt said that Google will make it HARDER to get that 3rd result in a given search, and then increasingly harder for every result after that.
- Ted Ulle (tedster) http://sphinn.com/story/17696#c21173
Lovely, in their efforts to combat spam domains they're going to sabotage services like photo hosting that use subdomains per individual account.
Since when must someone have to pay for a unique domain name just to have a unique location on the internet?
Some ISPs still host sites like "//myisp.com/~useraccount" and those most certainly shouldn't be lumped together either.
Another example of Google trying to dictate how the internet works.
Perhaps google will acknowledge popular enough subdomains like a blogspot blog, or flickr account. If this is to be a general rule, then the possibility of the enforcers making exceptions where deserved should not be overlooked.
That is the sort of clarification that I am expecting Matt Cutts to talk about.
How do you identify a domain anyway? Is it...
here.com
here.co.uk
here.freehost.com
here.freehost.co.uk
Doesn't look like it is a standard number of dots away from the right.
There will be an exceptions list I guess? and I imagine that is where these common second level domains will be. Good bye free web hosting though? A lot of smaller places won't get noticed enough for this exclusion..
@incrediBill I think that's the tragedy here... he didn't say/mean that, but it got reported that way. subdomains don't belong to Google or spam team, but as subdomains present a problem for them, they will address it. And they are already considering addressing it ("in some situations") along the lines of how they address folders.
I think webmasters need to pay more attention to what they are doing and less attention to what reporters are saying Google is saying.
"Why do I get the feeling that this will apply to everyone BUT Google?"
searchenginefriend, the algorithm runs equally for every query; there's no hard-coded special cases.
My clarification is here, in case people are interested: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/subdomains-and-subdirectories/
Wow. What about sites like about.com who thrive due to subs being treated as powerful as base domain..?
I guess Google needs to do something about all the mass-junk site-creators pumping endless blogs and sites and subs and I guess it's only fair to let others also get a place not only one site dominating full page. However, what with web2.0 tricks even this measure would not help... It's coming out of the box...
See some videos and learn some tricks here for better SERP: web 2.0 SEO Videos for tricks & tactics
Curly.
--------- Custom PeelAwayAds --- Add A Peel to Your Site