Published: Dec 09, 2007 - 09:14 am
Story Found By: gyutae 1629 Days ago
Category: SEO
12 Comments
12 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Why do I get the feeling that this will apply to everyone BUT Google?
I bet your totally right SEF
I think everyone has extrapolated far too much from what was actually said.Matt has said he will clarify this in the next few weeks.
Heres what Matt Cutts said on SER regarding this:"This isnt a correct characterization of what Google is looking at doing. What I was trying to say is that in some circumstances, Google may move closer to treating subdomains as we do with subdirectories. Ill talk about this more at some point after I get back from PubCon."
Clarification to be coming in WebProNews PubCon video with Matt:http://videos.webpronews.com/tag/pubconMatt said that Google will make it HARDER to get that 3rd result in a given search, and then increasingly harder for every result after that. - Ted Ulle (tedster) http://sphinn.com/story/17696#c21173
Lovely, in their efforts to combat spam domains theyre going to sabotage services like photo hosting that use subdomains per individual account. Since when must someone have to pay for a unique domain name just to have a unique location on the internet?Some ISPs still host sites like "//myisp.com/~useraccount" and those most certainly shouldnt be lumped together either.Another example of Google trying to dictate how the internet works.
Perhaps google will acknowledge popular enough subdomains like a blogspot blog, or flickr account. If this is to be a general rule, then the possibility of the enforcers making exceptions where deserved should not be overlooked.
That is the sort of clarification that I am expecting Matt Cutts to talk about.How do you identify a domain anyway? Is it...here.comhere.co.ukhere.freehost.comhere.freehost.co.ukDoesnt look like it is a standard number of dots away from the right.
There will be an exceptions list I guess? and I imagine that is where these common second level domains will be. Good bye free web hosting though? A lot of smaller places wont get noticed enough for this exclusion..
@incrediBill I think thats the tragedy here... he didnt say/mean that, but it got reported that way. subdomains dont belong to Google or spam team, but as subdomains present a problem for them, they will address it. And they are already considering addressing it ("in some situations") along the lines of how they address folders. I think webmasters need to pay more attention to what they are doing and less attention to what reporters are saying Google is saying.
"Why do I get the feeling that this will apply to everyone BUT Google?"searchenginefriend, the algorithm runs equally for every query; theres no hard-coded special cases.My clarification is here, in case people are interested: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/subdomains-and-subdirectories/
Wow. What about sites like about.com who thrive due to subs being treated as powerful as base domain..?I guess Google needs to do something about all the mass-junk site-creators pumping endless blogs and sites and subs and I guess its only fair to let others also get a place not only one site dominating full page. However, what with web2.0 tricks even this measure would not help... Its coming out of the box...See some videos and learn some tricks here for better SERP: <a href="http://www.Photo-Facelift.com/web-20-seo">web 2.0 SEO Videos for tricks & tactics</a>Curly.--------- Custom PeelAwayAds --- Add A Peel to Your Site