FeedsSorry this site requires JavaScript to be enabled in your browser. See the following guide on How to enable JavaScript in Internet Explorer, Netscape, Firefox and Safari. Alternatively you may be blocking JavaScript with an advert-related or developer plugin. Please check your browser plugins.
Sphinn Sponsors
Private Forums
Top 10 Most Sphunn Latest Submissions
- Taking stock of the SEO mindset (17)
- 301 Redirects Do Not Pass Full… (14)
- 29 Tidbits from Eric Enge's… (14)
- Matt Cutts Clarifies Points in… (11)
- SEO Trademark Registration… (10)
- A modest proposal for SEO… (9)
- 8 ways to get more out of your… (8)
- Think Visibility Conference… (7)
- Is Pay-Per-Click Advertising Old… (6)
- Affiliate Marketing: Choosing The… (6)
- Great article Alan and very good information for…
- No more rediculous then the notion that you…
- Yup, a great interview!
- The complete interview is…
- Yes, and for those of you who have not seen the…
- As always, GREAT interview Eric! Some really…
- Hey Hugo... thanks for the Sphinn... This is…
- Wow. I can't believe you did all that Rhea and…
- Thanks guys! It was a crazy two years. Glad it's…
- Thanks Rhea! You Rock!
- - Read more -
Latest Posts In Sphinn Blog
RSS Feeds
Upcoming Conferences
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Upcoming Webcasts
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
- Hey! That’s My Conversion – February 25, 2010
- Business Blogging & SEO – March 11, 2010
- Excel Tips & Tricks for PPC Success – March 18, 2010
Comments
An interesting tidbit from Bergy (Google) on the SWFobject http://groups.google.com/group/Google_Webmaster_Help-Indexing/msg/b22f66ab527a069a raises a question WRT Dan Crow’s talk at the SEMNE session: http://groups.google.com/group/Google_Webmaster_Help-Indexing/msg/29d339bbdfbef2df Worth digging deeper I think.
Very interesting article and thanks to Sebastian for the links. I’m divided on Flash - my aesthetic heart says yes; my SEO mind still says no!
There is nothing "agressive" about that.
yeh thats the way I have done it in the past doesn’t mention the masive increase in cost and time to develop in that way though. there are probaly much better ways of spending that cash.
IMHO not new info, not the best way to manage Flash, and not an authoritative article. We don’t care what the W3C says about validity, and labeling it "aggressive" is a cop out for an honest professional SEO opinion. SEO is all about Google’s opinion. Google has already addressed the issue many times, including just weeks ago in July http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/07/best-uses-of-flash.html If I could add a -1 to the Sphinn count I would, but it seems Sphinn is a popularity contest ;-)