Published: Jan 03, 2008 - 12:32 pm
Story Found By: jeffquipp 1603 Days ago
Category: SEO
Very insightful!
6 Comments
6 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Sigh.Am I the only one that remembers Google became a registrar a couple of years ago?http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1758511,00.aspNothing like having complete access to every domain name registration to track people.
Sounds logical like many other imaginary methods attributed to Google. But is this really so easy and resource-efficient to do with hundreds of millions of domains? Is the potential benefit for Google worth it?On a theoretical basis, most of us could devise a lot of correlations, coincidences and probabilities that could be cross-checked by a search engine.However, not being search engineers we dont really know the investment (time, engineering, processing capacity) needed for such tracking and checking. So what seems to be a great idea in theory might be unfeasible in practice, or just not "profitable".On the other hand, I do feel paranoid sometimes. After all, Google thrives on data. They might as well cross-reference absolutely every type of data they possess to see potentially useful signals.In that case, practically any kind of behavior could become risky.What if they realize that people who check into their AdSense account more than twice a day are 3.4% more likely to have MFA sites? Or webmasters who submit sitemaps are 6.8% more likely to buy links? Or people who log in to their Gmail account from more than 3 different IPs are 4.7% more likely to use invisible text on their sites?Or any other crazy, unexpected coincidence?Whatever you do online, if it is seen by Google, it might work out against you because you may unwittingly behave in a way thats going to make you suspect statistically.And "statistically" is all they care about, as evident from their "guilty until proven innocent" stance.
solid article, i can see the logic in all 3 theories and the first two are simple obvious ones, but i guess many people do make these mistakes...
Sigh. Bill, I addressed that ;-)@sza: The big G has been known to do some weird ass things in the world of banning...they have been known to make connections that are really hard to connect.Remember, not too long ago, Google was almost overwhelmed by spam. Its well worth it to them to invest their resources.
Yep Bill - I addressed that point with Barry in 2005 :)http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/001468.htmlPeople interested in this subject though should take a look at the Registrant Search feature at DomainTools (http://sphinn.com/story.php?id=13755) That has gone a long way in connecting the dots between domain portfolios. Its also a proof of concept for the kind of system they might have in-house. One of the main advantages to becoming a registrar is better access to APIs for data mining -as I wrote on Jims blog back then:http://www.jimboykin.com/what-does-google-know-about-your-domain-names-by-nick-wilsdon/
Shady, too long a post... guess I glossed over it