Published: Jan 10, 2008 - 04:41 am
Story Found By: AndrewofNagy 1956 Days ago
Category: SEO
7 Comments
7 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:


Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Digital Marketing Depot. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Interesting quote:First your boss asks you to cram in some keywords, then "borrow" some images, and then create "just a few hundred brand awareness" sites.Eventually it becomes "please remove the copyright info from this jscript", then send an email to this "single opt-in" list of 10 million addresses, and lastly "Can you use an Ess Que El injecion to insert our website address in other peoples sites?".One big slippery slope...
The original article is here:http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23621"Thats the suggestion being made by Google Web-spam enforcer/blogger Matt Cutts in a provocative post thats unlikely to win him friends among SEO types, many of whom already consider Cutts the enemy."Whatever Matt Cutts says, he has been way more helpful than hurtful in his involvement with webmasters and the SEO community. Though what he writes often is purposefully vague, contain a pro-Google bias, and is open to dozens of misinterpretations, Matt Cutts - as a source of SEO information - beats the crap out of almost all major and minor SEO bloggers that exist today, 90% of whom dont even talk about SEO anymore.What about Matt Cutts and paid links? People who do SEO for a living know better than to blatantly rub paid links on Googles face. Those professionals dont give a shit about Googles stance on paid links because they do not leave their paid links out in the open.
@AndrewofNagy: Just a comment to say thats a great avatar.
@planetc1: Well thanks! Photoshop is great, isnt it?
There are loads of SEO consultants and agencies out there who will happily take money from naive clients and then provide them with a service that the know fine well can put the site at risk. No different from a builder using sub par materials then doing a runner.At one point back in my agency days, I reckon about 40% of my clients came through the door with a penalised site - sometimes from DIY SEO; mostly from sub par services they paid for.
The old "ethics" arguments about SEO are coming up on /. which IMO are entirely missing the point - the guy was done for potential fraud outside of the net:http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/015849.html
Tut tut, Matt Cutts getting in to trouble. Well there you go, a chink in the Google armour. Fair play though if you ask me. :)