- 10
- Sphinn It!
Topic Type: News Story (Jump to http://www.insuremeblog.com)
Category: Other Online Marketing
8 Comments
8 Comments
Save the date for:
SMX China (Nanjing) - Sept. 23-24
SMX Stockholm - Sept. 23-24: See who's speaking or register now.
SMX East (New York City) - Oct.
6-8: See the agenda or register today and save!
SMX London - Nov. 4-5: Pre-agenda rate now available. Click here.
Comments
Been meaning to blog my own tips here. On its versus it's, very easy test. Simply ask yourself if you can replace its with it is. If you can -- use it's. If you can't, it's its.
It's a great reminder that this requires skill. If you don't have the basics, people will notice. Part of it involves style - website vs. web site. The key is consistency. One client opted to spell swingset and swing set the two ways on two pages to appeal to the way people search.
"[Note: After writing an entire article on writing and grammar, there is no doubt in my mind that even after re-reading this post three times there has got to be a GLARING grammatical error somewhere in the post. Please forgive me for my sins.]"
I didn't catch a grammatical error, but you did misspell "nemesis."
Your point is one I always stress. I wrote a proposal recently in which I noted that the site's pages needed to be rewritten because they were all pretty much the same, they had no relation to keywords that would make sense for them, they didn't appear to be written with the goal of marketing to the site's audience, and they were full of grammatical and spelling errors. The owner of the site was a little insulted by that last point.
I'm sure he'll get over it. You don't want to looooooose (that one should be on your list) customers just because your site makes it look like you're either uneducated or you just don't care.
This isn't as big a deal, but I get a bit irked when people confuse "e.g." and "i.e." Then again, I have always been a Grammar Nazi. :P
I'm amazed at how often I come across a great blog or website article - by a professional that I look up to - that has spelling and/or grammatical errors. I've seen Matt Cutts, Rand Fishkin, and a few others make mistakes that are laughable.
Then again, we're all only human. Except for Matt.
Some errors are impossible to spot, even when re-read half a dozen times, until you come back to the post you made at least a day later.
I'll forgive bloggers who publish with a few errors, but I'll take note if those errors remain there for more than a few days...
I'm with you g1smd, blogging is a bit of an exception to the rule. After-all, blogs are the personality of those who write them.
But when it comes to business blogs and e-mail, grammar could make a world of a difference.
I agree: it depends a lot on the nature of the blog. If it's a serious business blog, then of course its quality reflects on your business. But if it's a personal blog, you have to allow for some grammatical license.
Some of the posts on my blog contain phrases only I use, intentional misspellings and lousy grammar, especially when I'm paraphrasing statements made by a certain politician.
Luckily, I'm pretty much my only regular reader, so I don't get a lot of complaints.