Sphinn Home » SEO
Man I'm so tempted ;)
4 Comments     

Comments

from Lodispoto 525 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

When they realize how stupid that is it'll be removed from their user agreement. They want deep linking as we all know.

from BogglesMyMind 522 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

Hmmm I wonder how long they keep their articles "live" at the site.  I know that I get frustrated when I read an old blog post which cites a Yahoo news story, for example, because often the content has expired and you get an error page when you click through to Yahoo.

If I am not going to keep an article on the same page forever I may want to dissuade someone from linking deeply?

Not saying this is why but that would be a reason to consider this rule, non?

from mattstoddart 522 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

good example of why lawyers and SEO don't mix.

from JakePM 522 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

hmmmm.  i would think that's more geared to "scraping" rather than traditional "linking" in to the site.  I could be wrong.  if so...too bad for them, but it's interesting to note.


Log in to comment or register here.

Sphinn Sponsors

Be a Sphinn Sponsor - Click Here

Search Marketing Expo

Save the date for:
SMX Singapore - July 2-3, 2009
SMX São Paulo - August 4-5
SMX East - October 5-7, 2009
SMX Stockholm - 12-13 October, 2009
SMX Mexico - November 11, 2009

Search Marketing Now

Learn more about search marketing through free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site Search Marketing Now.

Upcoming Webcasts: