Sphinn Home » SEO
Man I'm so tempted ;)
4 Comments     

Comments

from Lodispoto 163 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

When they realize how stupid that is it'll be removed from their user agreement. They want deep linking as we all know.

from BogglesMyMind 160 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

Hmmm I wonder how long they keep their articles "live" at the site.  I know that I get frustrated when I read an old blog post which cites a Yahoo news story, for example, because often the content has expired and you get an error page when you click through to Yahoo.

If I am not going to keep an article on the same page forever I may want to dissuade someone from linking deeply?

Not saying this is why but that would be a reason to consider this rule, non?

from mattstoddart 160 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

good example of why lawyers and SEO don't mix.

from JakePM 160 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

hmmmm.  i would think that's more geared to "scraping" rather than traditional "linking" in to the site.  I could be wrong.  if so...too bad for them, but it's interesting to note.


Log in to comment or register here.
Search Marketing Expo

Save the date for:
SMX Local & Mobile - San Francisco, CA (July 24-25) See the agenda, and register now!
SMX Sao Paolo - Brazil - (Aug. 7-8)
SMX China - September 23 & 24, 2008
SMX Stockholm - September 23 & 24, 2008
SMX East - NYC - (Oct. 6-8) Registration is now open.
SMX London - November 4 & 5, 2008