Published: Feb 26, 2008 - 07:40 pm
Story Found By: DoshDosh 1913 Days ago
Category: Link Building
11 Comments
11 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:


Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Digital Marketing Depot. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Excellent points Rae and welcome to LinkWeek!!The best content in the world is meaningless untilsomeone knows about it, and more importanly, linksto it. Until then, its just files on a server, growing mold.Eric
"How depending only on quality content ..." would have been a less attention-grabbing, but at the same time also less deceptive title.
IMHO, youre just nitpicking the meaning... the title wasnt meant to be deceptive... it was how it came out in my head... "Why you shouldnt depend on your paycheck to build your retirement account" is no more deceptive than "Why you shouldnt depend ONLY on your paycheck to build your retirement account"... except that youre not looking at that one under a microscope...
Suggarrae - i think everyone would agree your titles not deceptive. Great post.
Great post Rae
Nitpicking, perhaps.The concept of quality content costing links is counter-intuitive, therefore it raises the interest. People see it and think, what the hell? (I did.)On the other hand, the idea that you shouldnt exclusively rely on quality content but you should also actively promote it is good advice (and I absolutely agree with it), but its common sense.Thats why I think the title without "only" is meant to be more controversial-sounding than the actual article is. And this is "deceptive" in my dictionary. The article itself is OK, its only the title...
I like the column, but I feel like its sort of restating a given.The point here is that all things being equal, a site with quality content will facilitate link-building outreach much better than one with less (or no) quality content.Put it to you this way, if two sites did little or no promotion (like the site referenced in this post) but one had quality content on an ongoing basis, and the other didnt, guess which one would probably attract more unsolicited links?
Thanks for the article! It is a good read :)@ hugoguzman - Marketing is all about soliciting and ultimately it is those who produce good content and network for links that benefit ;)
Thats my point, though.This article seems to state a given, but spins it as if it where an original insight.
Good post. The last point is critical - you wont get links if you dont link in return- link out when it makes sense and follow up with notifications to companies or people who have been mentioned or cited in the article once it has been published
>>>but I feel like its sort of restating a givenIf it were a given, in all honesty, I wouldnt have been able to write it because the other competing site (and it is a high dollar site, its not a one man shop) would have done "the given" and gotten the links two days before me.A lot of SEO is a "given". It is a "given" that you should have unique title tags on every page, yet, it is the most common error I see when looking at sites in site clinics from companies who care enough about/are into seo enough to pay to send employees to a conference. The link within the post to the "unique content" article doesnt state anything more than the "given" either, but sometimes explaining something in a new way can make the majority who dont automatically get what a minority of us consider a "given"get it. Additionally, my other attempt was to get people to realize how many links you can actually leave on the table by depending on your content alone. Remember, the other site got 40 links - that isnt a bad haul at the end of the day and one a lot of webmasters would be happy with... but they left now over 1000 on the table... @richiepear - agreed... we have had numerous sites this year telling us theyll link to us over the competition whenever possible because we at least do the same when they have something of interest, when the competition is extremely stingy with outbound link flow (and a lot of these are industries that dont "get" SEO... they simply do it to be stingy LOL).