Published: Mar 05, 2008 - 10:45 am
Story Found By: northrock 1543 Days ago
Category: SEO
6 Comments
6 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Thanks for sphinning this, Chris. The more intriguing thing is that, despite the 301 permanent redirect, both the old URL and the new URL show in the SERPs. The redirect was put in place 6 days ago. My working hypothesis is that the old one is not de-indexed but eventually will sink without trace.
Very interesting find Barry. Thanks for sharing!
Thanks Barry..Easy on the eyes..Good information. *-)
*** The more intriguing thing is that, despite the 301 permanent redirect, both the old URL and the new URL show in the SERPs. ***The old URL will take up to a year to drop out (though that time scale seems to be reducing with each new Google advance). It will likely languish in Supplemental for most of that time. That is NOT a problem, as your on-site redirect will deliver the visitor to the correct content at the correct URL anyway.I covered this topic in great depth over at webmasterworld a couple of years ago if you want some more detail as to how it appears to work.
Youre correct that the cache date for the "old" URL is now frozen at the last date content was directly recoverable from the old URL. The old URL will hang around for quite a while longer after Google "sees" the 301 redirect is in place. That is not a problem. One major error that some people make when using redirects to fix canonicalisation issues, is to not update the URLs seen in the internal links of their site. That can cause major issues. never let people click through a redirrect while they are browsing your site by following internal navigation links..
Thats very interesting, g1smd. That would imply that they keep a URL in their index but never spider it. I thought that even for URLs in the Supplemental Index, they spidered very occasionally. To all intents and purposes, the URL is completely dead, particularly in the mind of the creator. What is the logic for Google not dropping it after a short delay?