Sphinn Home » Other Social Media
It’s not that I am against disapproval or criticism in general - no, I am not going to put the necessity of negative voting under question - my main point that negative voting should make sense.
3 Comments     

Comments

from annie7 487 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

Wow, Maki, how do you manage to be the first everywhere? Thank you for the submission - I am honored!

from JamesDuthie 486 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

The thumbs down is unfortunately a necessary evil to control abuse of our favourite social media sites. Personally I barely ever use it unless I'm ridiculously opposed to the article (ie. violence, racism etc). If I don't like an article I simply won't vote.

From an author's perspective, I prefer the mandatory comment option. In my view a negative vote questions the quality and credibility of an article (although I understand not everyone sees it that way). So if someone is questioning the quality of my work I'd like to know why. Who knows... it might open my mind and a healthy discussion/debate.

Without a comment we can't assess whether the criticism is valid.

from onreact 486 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

I think the Mixx "vote down" feature works quite well as people are not ANONYMOUS. Here on Sphinn the solution is OK too. On SU I'm not sure. Digg is really broken due to the "bury feature" there.


Log in to comment or register here.

Sphinn Sponsors

Be a Sphinn Sponsor - Click Here

Search Marketing Expo

Save the date for:
SMX Singapore - July 2-3, 2009
SMX São Paulo - August 4-5
SMX East - October 5-7, 2009
SMX Stockholm - 12-13 October, 2009
SMX Mexico - November 11, 2009

Search Marketing Now

Learn more about search marketing through free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site Search Marketing Now.

Upcoming Webcasts: