Story Found By: christographer 1780 Days ago
Category: Searching
2 Comments
2 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Very interesting interview, especially since Nielsen is not expressing much optimism about the improvements to the search in the near future. One thing that I think is missing from their discussion, is a potential shift of the search results paradigm. I dont mean the layout of results, but rather the overall expectations of users from the search. See my Sphinn post "What Users Want From Search" about an emerging alternative (http://sphinn.com/story/318).
After reading this interview, Im convinced that theres a serious need to add search topics to usability conferences. 1. Dr. Nielsens description of how Amazons item-to-item collaborative filtering works is completely wrong. See; Collaborative recommendations using item-to-item similarity mappings http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=6,266,649.PN.&OS=PN/6,266,649&RS=PN/6,266,649 2. The SERPS of 2003 didnt include a blended mix of videos, news, maps, product search, book results, and information from many other separate databases. They didnt include mid page query refinements based upon user behavior interaction with the search engine. They didnt show query refinements from Google Base type databases. They didnt show sitelink styled links that attempt to anticipate final destinations on a domain. 3. The relevance paradigm of search engines isnt switching from an IR information system approach to a popularity approach. Popularity approaches, with quality factors like PageRank, have been around since 1998. The movement isnt towards the "best" page based upon popularity - its an attempt to find the right page for the person searching - so that there is no one "best" page.