- 12
- Sphinn It!
Topic Type: News Story (Jump to http://www.brucecat.com)
Category: Google SEO
1 Comment
1 Comment
Save the date for:
SMX Madrid (in Spanish, May 20-21)
SMX Advanced - Seattle, WA (June 3-4) Register today!
SMX Local & Mobile - San Francisco, CA (July 24-25) See the agenda, and register now!
SMX East - NYC - (Oct. 6-8)
SMX London - November 4 & 5, 2008
Comments
Even if this were not legit, (but I believe it is) it's quite a good bit of info, and should be read by everyone.
It's well worth grabbing a copy of the .pdf file and reading it at your leisure, but the key theme throughout the entire original document (blog article links to it) and throughout the summary on the blog post seems to be "added value".
No matter what sort of site you have, if you're not adding something useful, shut up and face it - you're a spammer.
Throughout the document, definitions of added value kept popping up, like this -
Notice anything missing? Like perhaps subject relevant original content?
Ahh, further down, content is mentioned, but it's not a perceived added value unless it's a review?
Well excuse me, but as an owner of some sites labeled here as "thin affiliates", I work very hard to get original quality content on these sites, and this statement ticks me off -
So by adding original subject relevant content, the intent is to decieve? At least the author grudgingly says that they CAN'T label those as spam, but their bias shows through. What does he have against ghost writers?
Um, yeah - the intent is to "deceive" people into believing the site is an authority on the subject of widgets, and at the same time provide links to buy those widgets.
Apparently this "deception" can be accomplished by adding dozens or hundreds of original articles about the very industry for which you're a "thin affiliate". How deceptive.
I'll say again, the document is well worth grabbing and saving for reference.