Published: Mar 21, 2008 - 07:03 am
Story Found By: DavidWallace 1425 Days ago
Category: SEM
5 Comments
5 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
WPN video is so nice and clean and the player loads well in my browser. Anyone suggest options for reproducing this for videos that are not high bandwidth (but high quality) and can be hosted on a dedicated server?
I had a recent coversation through email with Aaron Wall. I sent him a few of my points concerning PR Sculpting and how much i thought it was a load of crap: Point 1 - We live in a bubble. 99% of the world doesn’t know what nofollow is and probably will never know until the W3 add it as proper markup. So are we to believe that Google has granted SEOs ONLY this special attribute that can help us rank better. No. It is only for Google benefit, not ours. Point 2 - The theory has not been tested enough and probably cant be properly tested since to many outside forces effect rankings. That is why this 2nd order effect has no bearing. No has proven that spending a few minutes using nofollow helps your website do any better. Google is simply telling you that is will. Point 3 - External nofollow: The web and Googles algorithm was built on the concept of linking one document to another. Now we should continue to do this, but in way that does not pass search engine value through the link? Who is benefiting here? The SE algo only. This really goes against why the web was built on links. Point 4 - Internal nofollow: I simply default to this post by Michael Martinez: http://seo-theory.com/wordpress/2008/03/05/yes-virginia-your-contact-page-does-need-500-links/ Point 5 - PR is not tangible. One page doesn’t have 100 PR credits that you can feel free to divvy up as you like through internal linking. It is not that simple. The point I am trying to make is that these SEOs are trying to say they can sculpt something like PR. We all know toolbar PR is crap and internal PR is not known so…..where does one get off saying they can sculpt something they dont know?
"where does one get off saying they can sculpt something they dont know?"If you can get dressed in the dark, why not sculpt in the dark? Surely the results will be equally as effective! ;)Hehe, Im just being silly. IMHO, it could have an effect, but it kills the point of PR. Youll recall that it measures the likelihood of people visiting any given site. Hence Yahoo = PR 10, newbie blogspot blogs = 0. But with PR being prophesized as a voting/democratic system (nice public relations move, Google/Matt), you end up with dorky ideas like nofollow that are unrelated to whether or not someone will click a link...
" 99% of the world doesn’t know what nofollow is and probably will never know until the W3 add it as proper markup"After that 98.999999% still wont know about it.
PR Sculpting is crap and I am so tired of hearing about it.