Published: Mar 21, 2008 - 10:19 am
Story Found By: SlightlyShadySEO 1420 Days ago
Category: SEO
16 Comments
16 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
very sneaky. although I am not sure about the cost(effort)/benefit factor here, since it seems like a huge hassle to do just so you can hide a link. On the other hand the hassle factor ensures it will not get abused.
slightly shady, but good to know about :)
See, Google will end up owning all text link ads :)
@ wiep - u had me lol there :). @ brett - its slightly shady, and submitted here by same (thanks xmcp!) but written by yours truly.neyne - glad you like it. as to the huge hassle, depends where youre buying the link from. also, if youre a big content network advertiser, you can probably template the images and have a batch/variety to dispense around, thus simplifying things. You could also template in the most popular color schemes...
Clever idea, but there is are ways to immediately see through this. Once Google reads that post, trying it would be dangerous.
Heh have you read the manual review guidelines? I think in many cases weve been overestimating them.
Great writeup Gab.. I promise Im getting back to you on that interview, just swamped!
Pocket, glad you like the idea. Also, it might not be immediately clear, but the main point of this is to defeat competitors trying to review your site. Naturally Google can check whos advertising where and use its in house data to see if its true. But that would mean giving cheaply paid human reviewers access to loooots of proprietary data. Not sure theyd do that with contractors. But bottom line I agree that if Matt Cutts wants to manually review an AdSense unit, hell be able to discern between the two. But theres only so many Matt Cuttses around ;).
@Gab: Youre obviously forgetting about GoogleClone, their insurance for when he retires.
@ Tyler - thanks :). Look forward to chatting more bud :).@ Shady - Thats why Googles been making all those mvoes in the health market, eh??
@Gab: Yup! That and so they can show items with higher prices and such to people on anti-anxiety meds.
lol :)
Its an interesting idea, but I have to say, as a big fan of trying to build a user experience around links, if there isnt a natural way to make a link sit on a page, then is it really a good idea to try and insert links in a hidden format?
@iBrian: note the "grayhat" ;-)
Brian, if you think these links dont sit naturally on the page, then I guess you feel the same about adsense? And no ones hiding the links - theyre out there in plain view. These arent 1x1 pixel ads...
seems more black than grey, but maybe still good