Sorry this site requires JavaScript to be enabled in your browser. See the following guide on How to enable JavaScript in Internet Explorer, Netscape, Firefox and Safari. Alternatively you may be blocking JavaScript with an advert-related or developer plugin. Please check your browser plugins.

Sphinn Home » SEM
Google Bombs, Jew Watch News & the Hypocritical Linking Universe
SEM News Source: http://searchenginewatch.com
Published: Mar 30, 2008 - 04:38 pm
Story Found By: SpostareDuro 1877 Days ago
Category: SEM
Does Google allow some Google Bombs based on corporate PR agenda and diffuse the rest? How can Google possibly avoid the intertwined politics of some bombs? What exactly is the fine line between kosher link building, paid linking, good SEO and black hat Google bombs? How does Google’s taste, editorial discretion, or standardized algorithmic hooks affect their perception as to whether a pattern is “natural” or not?
 Comments16 Comments  

Comments

Avatar
from planetc1 1877 Days ago #
Votes: 1

This is a touchy subject few may want to address but Marty has really done quite a job of putting the spotlight on this issue. The methods and results are not limited to religion, I’ve witnessed the same tactics applied to "hate" sites of another nature and they share similar rankings to those mentioned in Marty’s post. Continued improvements in the works by Google will be well appreciated by many.

Avatar
from aimClear 1877 Days ago #
Votes: 0

@Michael: Thank you for the insight, Google is made up of humans who are stakholders. Humans are not perfect.

Avatar
from eric55 1875 Days ago #
Votes: 0

"google bomb" is confusing as used here.  Never heard of it used this way.In Black Hat, common term "Google Bomb" means to build links in a way that will make your competitor drop mainly by submitting there sites to spammy pages full of viagra links and such.  And to spam links at a very fasst level to these bad neighborhoods so it’s unnatural.  This article is quite confusing I thought.

Avatar
from aimClear 1875 Days ago #
Votes: 1

@eric55: Thank you for your comment. That’s the point exactly! There is little difference between "Google Bombs" (however you describle them) & SEO. The difference is all in what Google describes as "natural," which can’t help but be influenced by human factors.

Avatar
from TinPig 1875 Days ago #
Votes: 1

@aimClear - Excellent article. I rarely hear SEOs so comfortably discuss the failings of the link-based Page Rank (and thus Relevancy) algorithms. It’s really quite a delicate and tenuous position Google and the SEO industry are in right now. As you state so clearly, the current environment cannot be effectively managed by Google (or other search engines). Yet an entire industry (SEO) and the fate of tens of thousands of web sites would be adversely affected if the link-based strucuture was dropped or changed significantly.

Avatar
from baiduyou 1875 Days ago #
Votes: 1

Great article Marty.

Avatar
from aimClear 1875 Days ago #
Votes: 0

Search is a difficult problem. Search engines, like divorce laws, are imperfect solutions for impossible  problems.

Avatar
from mblumenthal 1875 Days ago #
Votes: 1

It is of interest to me that on the search "n***er" that there is not equivalent Google warning.<div></div><div>Mike</div>

Avatar
from TinPig 1875 Days ago #
Votes: 1

@mblumenthal - google probably added that warning for "jew" to explain the search results, which were clearly manipulated (like most search results these days). the difference, i think, is that "jew" on it’s own doesn’t carry nearly as much negative impact and so the fact that you might find objectionable content toward the top of the search results for "n***er" is not as un-expected. google, or any search engine, cannot be expected to appologize for information it indexes and subsequently returns in search results that users find objectionable. there’s simply too much of it out there. in cases where the system has obviously been gamed (the end to the means of all SEOs), it’s not surprising that google would issue an appology - especially when the subject matter is sensitive.

Avatar Administrator
from dannysullivan 1875 Days ago #
Votes: 1

I’ve edited the n word. I know no one means offense in using it, but I’m going to star it out anyway.

Avatar
from aimClear 1875 Days ago #
Votes: 0

@Danny: Mike makes a compelling point none-the-less...and thanks for the moderation.

Avatar
from mblumenthal 1874 Days ago #
Votes: 2

@TinPig<div></div><div>Why would an apology be more appropriate than a penalty, then?</div><div></div><div>Mike</div>

Avatar
from aimClear 1874 Days ago #
Votes: 0

@Mike: Right. If ANY of us had orchestrated such an unnatural linking pattern on behalf of ANY site, we’d be like SO gone..and don’t get me wrong-JewWatchNews grosses me out. For goodness sake, we have sites that lost multiple PR ticks for simple little paid links...I would think the Google-penalty for such an overt display sheer link-bombing prowess would be like having someone "drawn and quartered" or some such thing.

Avatar
from TinPig 1874 Days ago #
Votes: 1

@mblumenthal - good point. i wasn’t trying to imply that a penalty wasn’t warrented in this situation and a penalty probably would have been a better response from google.  of course, this again highlights the complex nature of trying to police SEO activity. as it stands right now, page rank is clearly a popularity contest and has nothing to do with relevancy. and as such, content owners lobbying for votes in the contest are really only doing what would be expected. and so if i have the power of persuasion behind me and the gumption to go and out actively find votes, then why shouldn’t i win?

Avatar
from eric55 1874 Days ago #
Votes: 1

AimClear,If some areas of the Web are no longer a WILD west, SEO ain’t one of them.  There are no "standards" but it is also interesting how we see terms like "Google bowling" and think we know what they mean, only to discover months later that others have different ideas.

Avatar
from claires 1867 Days ago #
Votes: 0

Its a tough one, i mean on one hand you don’t want hate sites to receive any kind of extra exposure, but on the other hand... if Google BOMBS these, where does it stop. Anyone talking about China’s issues in favour of Tibet?It is a very good post and one that does not have a simple answer too

Upcoming Conferences

Search Marketing ExpoSearch Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.


SMX Web Site » | SMX Difference » | SMX News »

Join us at an upcoming SMX event:

Latest News From Marketing Land
Upcoming Webcasts

Digital Marketing Depot Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Digital Marketing Depot. Upcoming online events include:


Webcasts:
Research:
Whitepapers:

See More Topics

Latest News From Search Engine Land