Published: Apr 03, 2008 - 01:11 pm
Story Found By: DavidWallace 1410 Days ago
Category: Social Media
7 Comments
7 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
"foundation" = good word.
Great article. Its realistic and addresses a problem that affects more people than not, and the advice is fairly simple to put into practice. Only thing I would add would be more emphasis on "authenticity"... i.e., connecting with like-minded people is more than just using each other for Digg votes - you cant only ask for favors - you actually need to build some sort of authentic relationship with these friends.
Another great read from Jeff - I thought the Eagles pic was first class :) I would have gone for Johnny Cash myself -- Ring of Fire -- the optimum support circle.
@ Deb ... thanks! @ Melanie ... I was concerned people might think that. Stay tuned for next weeks post then (ie. what to do with this group of friends), and hopefully its help to paint a clearer picture.@ Paul ... thanks. Im an Eagles fanatic :)
Copy paste from post comment:Jeff this was such a great post. And I absolutely feel that you’re on the money. ‘a collective’ I love that. It’s so borgish. :-) This post makes a few of the points that I attempted to make with my “Sphinn Underdog” post. A few supporters that stick together can build quite the collective over a period of time. We grow and learn together.As long as we are providing quality content, authority grows and more will follow and so on. We have each other to call on in time of need and the list of friends continues to grow along with notoriety, readership and authority.Win win.Melanie: Id like to think that friend would be an automatic assumption of authenticity. Its a shame it has to be specified to make it decipherable.
SpostareDuro: It should be, but the word "friend" seems to have lost a lot of meaning in this brave new (social media) world of ours. When you can have 3,000+ friends on MySpace and you can mass-friend (verb) people by clicking a box without even adding a personal note (Facebook), it cant be assumed everyone defines the word the same way. There are friends and then there are social media "friends". Even the latter should be based on authenticity, but I dont think a lot of people (especially marketers) get that yet. Ones network is more (qualitatively) and less (quantitatively) than the sum of ones rolodex.
Melanie: I am an an active social media participant. And I do not friend people without being sincere.I repeat, "ID LIKE TO THINK THAT FRIEND WOULD BE AN AUTOMATIC ASSUMPTION OF AUTHENTICITY. ITS A SHAME IT HAS TO BE SPECIFIED TO MAKE IT DECIPHERABLE"For the record, I am no stranger to the realities of social media friending..I have been on the forced to accept reality end of the stick far too many times already. Nevertheless, we werent created to have to decipher the differences. There are those that choose to make excuses for seeing friendships as having exchangeable meanings to benefit a bank account or a profit design. Seeing this as acceptable is beneficial only on a superficial scale (pocket value). It is never beneficial to humanity. We have become become a generation of persons that lack the basic skills required to nuture the environment and humankind as it should be as a direct result of these choices. I am not condemning those that use social media for friendhips that bring about financial or other gain as opposed to sincerity of heart (and all that jazz) I am only staing that one does not have to exist without the other.