- 22
- Sphinn It!
Topic Type: News Story (Jump to http://www.securityfocus.com)
Category: Blogging
meta name="generator" content="WordPress
8 Comments
8 Comments
Save the date for:
SMX China (Nanjing) - Sept. 23-24
SMX Stockholm - Sept. 23-24: See who's speaking or register now.
SMX East (New York City) - Oct.
6-8: See the agenda or register today and save!
SMX London - Nov. 4-5: Pre-agenda rate now available. Click here.
Comments
Change meta tag from...
meta name="generator" content="WordPress bloginfo('version') "
(there is standard php stuff in there but old sphinn won't let me have them in the post.)
to
meta name="generator" content="WordPress 2.5"
Interesting I suspect this might make http://sphinn.com/story/40009 a bit more relevant though it should be pointed out this could potentially effect other versions as well.
I sphunn as the securityfocus site is relavent, however all previous versions of WordPress are at risk.
Yeah, what Tim said.
Damn it.
Ok, so... 2.3.3 is not listed, but we never heard from WP on this one:
New Wordpress 2.3.3 Exploit/Vulnerability - Adds Spam Directory /wp-content/1/
So, not sure what the best approach would be.
customize your code so much that it becomes your own version.
with WP being open source im kinda surprised no group has taken the code and just made it crazy secure and then redistributed it so it would still run plugins and templates like normal.
I would like to see someone take it and make a secure closed-source version. Then have them be responsible for making sure it still works with future plugins etc and everytime a new version is released. I'd be willing to pay for that. I wonder if there's a programmer willing to do that. And a person willing to be in charge of such a project.
There could be very good money in that if it's the real deal. Charge people yearly.
Well, there's a surprise. I'm with Jeeb90 - a paid, closed source version is the way to go. I'd pay just to avoid the tediousness of updating my WordPress blogs every 27 minutes or so.
do we really wait 27 minutes? i thought it more frequently than that..hmm