Published: Apr 17, 2008 - 02:47 am
Story Found By: DavidWallace 1396 Days ago
Category: SEM
8 Comments
8 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
...or we can begin calling it something else - like website optimization work (WOW!) or webpage optimization tips (wot - sucks, I know... :( )I recall an olde conversation that SEO wasnt really the most directly applicable description for the work most of us do these days - and looking forward, it stands to change even more.I know in my day, to actually get "seo" done, I spend more time tripping over so many other things that Id class as "product management" that its a wonder any "seo" ever gets done.Lets face it - the work we do impacts far more than just rankings in search engines:1 - resource allocation on the programming side2 - finance - direct to revenue3 - business development & partnership management4 - site taxonomies5 - content developmentetc., etc.To continue to call what we as "SEOs" do as "SEO is a bit narrow of focus, IMO.But, so it shall be I suppose - in the larger scope of the world, even SEO is still mostly unknown...LOLI say go ahead, get the trademark - and enjoy the ride trying to enforce it everywhere, because having the mark is one thing, being able to enforce it, well, thats another thing completely - and if you dont inforce those things vigorously, well, you kind of shoot yourself in the foot then.
Is this Jason Gambert person Microsoft in disguise? Theyre the ones obsessed with trademarking nonsensical things. I thought you couldnt trademark something if it would clearly cause confusion in the marketplace. Not sure what Gambert is thinking, but he wont be able to squash any of the domains with SEO in the domain name because they existed prior to the trademark. Maybe Gambert should be brought into a water-boarding room....hahaa.
Sounds interesting -- too bad its a video. I cant watch it here.
^ Same here, PocketSEO.Im definitely not worried about Mr. Gamberts aspirations to trademark the term SEO. Hes taking advantage of the fact that those in control of the situation are under-informed. Itll never stick, hes wasting his time/money. If I were him Id put my efforts to more fruitful pursuits, like building a website that isnt entirely Flash-driven and tacky.
meh. so Im a search engine marketer then.
Teh video is actually really good, with timelines and great background info on how all of this came together.
Make sure to read the comment on WebProNews by a user called, "Man you all need to calm down" - Does this make us see the light?SEO Trademark Video CommentsHurray for ArteWorks SEO for also filing an opposition!
Pixel, I read that, I like the guy on the bottoms response. Guy has a point, I would like to see Danny Sullivan etc. Be on the board.....What about you?