- 48
- Sphinn It!
Posted By: janecopland 426 days ago
Topic Type: News Story (Jump to http://ciarannorris.co.uk)
Category: Google Searching
8 Comments
8 Comments
Save the date for:
SMX Singapore - July 2-3, 2009
SMX São Paulo - August 4-5
SMX East - October 5-7, 2009
SMX Stockholm - 12-13 October, 2009
SMX Mexico - November 11, 2009
Learn more about search marketing through free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site Search Marketing Now.
Comments
As commented on the site itself: 1. ciaran, and god knows I love you Ciaran, just doesn't get how robots.txt and robots meta tags interact (hint: they don't, the first blocks the latter), and doesn't ask the obvious question of which weird internal link scheme get's 105,000 internal serps indexed...
And Joost, as commented on the site, we may have been naive, but there is no internal linking on the site. They're indexed because Google decided to start indexing them, and nothing anyone does will change that...
joost even if they delete the robots.txt line and even change from get to post, do you think these pages will have a tough time falling out of the index since they have alredy been crawled-->indexed?
Hi Jane http://ciarannorris.co.uk/2008/05/05/indexing-search-results-why-google-is-going-against-its-own-advice/
The URL of the story is now returning a 404 error
Please look into it
Thanks
Maverick
@maverick12210 works with me...
@maverick12210 Ah, it's not 404ing for me... might want to ask the author about it? He commented second on this thread.
Jane, great post. It appears that not only do they do this organically, they also do this in the PPC world when they recommend "non-quality score" methodologies for their adwords clients. Again, not practicing what they preach!
That's the way Google has always shown partially indexed pages (PIPs). They know they exist, but they're not fully indexed. In this case, they're not fully indexed because they are excluded via the robots.txt file.
Been this way forever with excluded URLs...nothing new here...