Published: May 05, 2008 - 01:34 pm
Story Found By: janecopland 1480 Days ago
Category: Searching
9 Comments
9 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
As commented on the site itself: 1. ciaran, and god knows I love you Ciaran, just doesnt get how robots.txt and robots meta tags interact (hint: they dont, the first blocks the latter), and doesnt ask the obvious question of which weird internal link scheme gets 105,000 internal serps indexed...
And Joost, as commented on the site, we may have been naive, but there is no internal linking on the site. Theyre indexed because Google decided to start indexing them, and nothing anyone does will change that...
joost even if they delete the robots.txt line and even change from get to post, do you think these pages will have a tough time falling out of the index since they have alredy been crawled-->indexed?
Hi Jane http://ciarannorris.co.uk/2008/05/05/indexing-search-results-why-google-is-going-against-its-own-advice/The URL of the story is now returning a 404 errorPlease look into itThanksMaverick
@maverick12210 works with me...
@maverick12210 Ah, its not 404ing for me... might want to ask the author about it? He commented second on this thread.
Jane, great post. It appears that not only do they do this organically, they also do this in the PPC world when they recommend "non-quality score" methodologies for their adwords clients. Again, not practicing what they preach!
Thats the way Google has always shown partially indexed pages (PIPs). They know they exist, but theyre not fully indexed. In this case, theyre not fully indexed because they are excluded via the robots.txt file. Been this way forever with excluded URLs...nothing new here...
not that good, as the comments clearly show Ciaran just doesnt get whats causing this... sorry.