Published: May 16, 2008 - 05:57 pm
Story Found By: SlightlyShadySEO 1469 Days ago
Category: SEO
In this entry, I talk about the various implications of this ranging from anti-trust to the adult industry.
3 Comments
3 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Thanks for this post. Im sure they would give a very good reason for doing this and they would have a different term for it other than "cloaking", theyre part of Google and they can get away with murder as far as I can tell. Its not do as I do, its do as I say and as long as theyre the top dog no level of critiscism is going to change that.
"Cloaking" goes on a lot of the time...just take a sample of stories from Google News...spiders are being shown different things from humans. Ads can be shown or the content can only be read once a visitor has registered with the site.
*sigh* I was hoping for a official response on this one. Double standards are ridiculously unfair, and I suspect will someday get Google in trouble. Fighting engrained competition is hard enough, but doing that with Google giving unfair consideration to these other companies (theres SO many double standards like this) it seems ridiculous.