Published: Jun 04, 2008 - 03:52 am
Story Found By: hugoguzman 1810 Days ago
Category: Analytics
8 Comments
8 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:


Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Digital Marketing Depot. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Mark Pilatowski made an interesting point.He says that his SEO shop tries to steer clients away from rankings and towards analytics but since all other oufits deliver rankings they feel forced to do so as well.Aint it the truth!As an industry, we need to start moving away from that logic.
Yeah, rankings do not work anymore, unless you check them at different locations or for small markets (in German/y you rank everywhere the same).
Interesting insight, onreact. In the end, even if youre in Germany, its still all about traffic and conversion.
Rankings on there own are a poor success metric, but they still have value. Yes, your search results might look different than mine, but as a trend, ranking data can sometimes be useful. I recently wrote a post (http://sphinn.com/story/45715) where I explored ideas for adding value to the typical ranking report by applying weighting factors to the rankings so the rank alone wouldnt determine success or failure.
@Marios - There is some value to trended ranking data, but again, the point is that ranking data is faulty and limited by data center and frequency of reporting.Even if you pulled rankings on a dialy basis (which very few outfits do...most pull the ranking data a few times per month at most) the data center issue renders those trends more or less useless.Its all about ROI. An hour spent pulling and analyzing ranking reports or an hour improving interlinking strategy or link-building or pulling analytics data?The answer is fairly simple when you look at it that way.P.S. Your link doesnt seem to be working.
Bob Massa recently had a post I dug (but didnt Digg...Dugg...) where he essentially said that a metrics importance is in the eye of the beholder:I always watch indicators and as for the term "important indicators", thats a subjective term. If you think they are important – youre right.In that context (e.g., if your clients rankings-obsessed), you may have to pay the piper, no matter how cacophonous the tune.
@Winooski - well said!
I recommend the ranking reports at http://www.keywordenvy.com as an example of ranking reports 2.0. It combines your ranking, with analytics data and conversion tracking to calculate an ROI per keyword, in addition to conversion rates and traffic metrics. Very interesting new service!