Published: Jun 20, 2008 - 03:41 pm
Story Found By: MattMcGee 1795 Days ago
Category: Searching
14 Comments
14 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:


Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Digital Marketing Depot. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
This is a nice addition, but its useless for small business owners/web sites. Theres not enough search volume for Trends to show any data. I tried my wifes real estate site, my previous employer (small web design/marketing company), and the site of one of the companies I profiled recently in my SEL column. No data for any.After that, I tried the web sites of two mid-sized, regional real estate companies (John L. Scott and Windermere) and there was data, but not very valuable. So, a cool addition, but not something everyone can benefit from. :-)
Checked it out. Like Matt said not much data for small business sites. There was some data for my site and other major sites in my industry but info is limited. Will be watching more closely.
Tnx for the commentary Matt... all SMB around here and wondered what value this would be.... saved me some time.
I imagine the jury is out on how much a company wants others to "easily" see this info. Of course, various SEO tools allow us to see similar data but not so aggregated.Curious, is this the "value" we get for adding Googles ga.js tracking code?Looks like sites who "share" data under Google Analytics Data Sharing Settings and have enough tracking are listed.http://www.google.com/intl/en/trends/websites/help/index.html#10The Google Analytics data in Trends for Websites comes from the anonymous opt-in data sharing setting in Google Analytics.Hey, look for "google.com" - no data appears! I looked for a bunch of other SEs; even dogpile.com appears. Interesting.
This is crossing the line. That data was highly confidential. WAS!
It doesnt work for me they way described in the post. I see no results for neither Search Engine Land nor for Search Engine Roundtable. Moreover I dont have the "also visited" and "also searched for" data for sites that actually appear.
How can any of this data ever be called "highly confidential"? if you dont want Google doing tihs block them from your website.
if you dont want Google doing tihs block them from your website.Youre saying that if you dont want Google sharing your traffic data you should remove your site from their index? Thats your solution?
Awesome data. About time. Yes, sensitive information but isnt most of this available via a paid service of some sort?BTW, I dont think the data is accurate for all traffic. Just traffic from Google.com to the site. So they dont state anything proprietary. All they state is how many unique visitors they sent to the given website.This will make my resume better. So I am happy! ;-)http://trends.google.com/websites?q=onecall.com&geo=US&date=all&sort=0And of course . . . the sites I currently work for, but Ill leave that alone for political reasons. ;-)Brent D. Payne
Do you suppose theres actually a good reason not to show data for smaller sites? As with smaller kws I dont believe they cant do it, but dont understand why they wont.
Confidential? Please. You were getting it from places like Alexa, Compete and Quantcast already. And if you were paying big bucks, you were getting it from Hitwise, comScore and NetRatings. Datas been out there for years, in various degrees of accuracy -- but to say it is confidential is overreaching.Opt-out? Absolutely should be provided, if Googles going to opt its own properties out. Stated reason for that is not to provide advanced financial guidance. That feels weak. I dont theres that much advanced financial guidance anyone will get from these numbers. I could argue that by not releasing these figures, Google potentially is disrupting the financial analysts in the wrong way, denying them yet another benchmark they might use in assessing the companys health that isnt denied for other public companies. But bottom line, other people might have their own reasons just like Google to want to opt-out -- so give it to them.
That is a very good point.I tried to do some financial trending for some other dot-coms using hitwise data when it first arrived on the scene as there is a direct correlation between traffic & revenue for most ecommerce properties which, voila, influences share price; too bad the data was never 100%.-RLPS: Someone sound the hypocrisy alarm!
We already wrote some parameters to use it in SeoQuake , so you can see all Gtrends data just in SERP or when you surfing . You can get them here http://addons.seoquake.com/params/index.php?sln=en&browse=2&tag=google&res_lim=10You should be logged in to your google account to get data.
That is great Gleb. Now if you could only ressurect the serparchive, that would be amazing...