Published: Jun 21, 2008 - 07:49 am
Story Found By: martinbowling 1331 Days ago
Category: SEM
13 Comments
13 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Im shocked that everyone is looking at the negative side of this tool. So great, they dont offer Google stats.So what? They do offer stats on all competitors in a particular verticle. Thats great news as far as Im concerned.
I think its a serious invasion of privacy. I can see its commercial value, but for Google to provide data on third party sites in public is pretty shocking, really.
I figured someone would vote down my comment. It failed to have the anti-Google slant that wins votes.iBrian - Alexa.com and other similar sites that offer data on third-party sites have been in existence for years, but nobody seemed to have a problem with them. Why all of a sudden, is everyone crying foul?
I am SO on the fence here.
I think people are more annoyed about this because Google, having the lions share of searches, will have far more accurate data than Alexa or Compete.
@DarkMatter - yeah, but isnt that a good thing? I, for one, like more accurate data.
@hugoguzman because competitors can look at my websites and possibly use the information to duplicate my tactics and take market share away.
@DarkMatter - the data may be more accurate, but your competitors could do exactly the same with a bunch of other tools right now.Sorry, this post is a total over-reaction.
it depends on the site youre looking at, but tools like compete.com and spyfu.com can be VERY misleading. I think its pretty interesting that our websites are there for the world to see, but Google is hiding their own. They obviously felt it would compromise their operation in some way, but they werent worried about you or me.
I have been preaching the opt in not opt out for Google for quite a while. Im with you on this one, Michael.
Regardless of how useful or accurate or rainbow-flavored the data is, Googles decision to block access to only their own stats just reeks of douchebaggery.
How can you call yourself a marketer and milit/post against free accurate data? lol
I think that Michael is spot-on with most of his criticisms of Google but I just think that this is a total over-reaction. Now, if it were based on GA data