- 43
- Sphinn It!
Posted By: MattMcGee 380 Days ago
Source: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com
Category: Vertical Search
5 Comments
5 Comments












Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:


Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Jumped from twitter to here to see if it was submitted. While its not flash, Im wondering about large pdf files. I have some searchable magazines (100mb pdfs) and Im concerned they are too big to load if clicked on.
Actually I like this title better because it sets expectations with the word improves.
Better brush up on your Flash skillz designers because whether SEOs like it or not, the market for Flash sites just shot up. I though Bruce Clays article on site owners should still avoid Flash but the reality is that just about everybody thinks that they want a "really glossy, interactive Flash site." In my experience as a designer, in the past I have had to persuade around 75% of my clients to forgo a pretty Flash site for a more SEO-friendly website but we dont really have that excuse anymore, do we? I still favor a clean HTML site but Im betting that were going to see a lot more light-weight, user-friendly flash sites (complete with separate URLs) in the future.
"but we dont really have that excuse anymore, do we? "dont count your chickens just yet. Improved indexing doesnt mean its weighed heavily in the algorithm. Past experience tells me that Google gives flash text about as much weight as alt tags, which is not much at all. Theres nothing to indicate that this has changed, just that they will now index more text.besides, there are multiple problems with flash beyond its indexability. Some people create entire websites within the same big flash document that lives on one html page. You cant use the back button, you cant cut and paste, you cant specify H tags to give precedence to information, you cant link to specific "pages". I would not use flash for anything but multimedia presentations and possibly a nifty menu system. But even then Id still include text links somewhere. Flash is still a weak choice.
All in all, this is good news for web designers, developers and SEOs alike."If you prefer Google to ignore your less informative content, such as a "copyright" or "loading" message, consider replacing the text within an image, which will make it effectively invisible to us."Not sure thats exactly future proof. Would be better for Google to come up with a special attribute, perhaps?