Published: Jul 03, 2008 - 01:40 am
Story Found By: PPCblogger 1319 Days ago
Category: SEO
2 Comments
2 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
I couldnt care less about the argument, I just still have questions Google refuses to answer. How about content delivery based on user behavior? If the bot behaves like a user it will see the same content. Or how about people who previously visited and have my cookie? Can I give them different content because I know who they are? (this is without logging in) This is the same thing as "IP Delivery" but its called behavioral targeting. This provides a better user experience and Im not trying to trick a bot, but Im pretty sure Google will crush my skull in their webmaster smasher if I do it.
TheMadHat if the cookie does it then its not cloaking since a crawler cant use a cookie. I totally disagree about using the userAgent only because if you are doing REAL content delivery the userAgent is the best way to know the capabilities of the Agent which in the new environment would also deliver content by the Device ie phone. Bad cloaking almost always uses an IP to identify a crawler. Like always if you arent doing it for SEs you are greatly reducing risk... because that is the context the whole cloaking debate should be in not WH or BH just good or stupid manipulation!IMO, Whitehat Cloaking is an OxyMoron much like Army Intelligence is an oxymoron!