Sphinn Home » Google SEO
Debra Mastaler ask Matt Cutt's if google counts the anchor found in a second link on a page. She tells Matt that if the question is one of those that hits too close to home - well - a general statement like "excessive reciprocal links" would be good too.

This is a question that we all want to hear a definitive answer from google.
12 Comments     

Comments

from Eavesy 42 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

New and better title suggestion: Matt Cutts Almost Confirms That The 2nd Anchor Text Does Count

from Jill 42 days ago # - show/hide this comment
Votes: -1 | Vote:
+ -

Wow. Did Matt really not understand that Debra was most likely asking about it when the anchor text was different in the second link?

At any rate, thanks to Debra for asking! Maybe Matt will even come back and answer it for real!

from debram 42 days ago #
Votes: 1 | Vote:
+ -

Nah, I think he got it Jill. ;) 


from Halfdeck 42 days ago # - show/hide this comment
Votes: -1 | Vote:
+ -

What would the SEO industry do without you Debra?

Matt's answer lines up with Dan Thies' earlier comments on Sphinn regarding this, that sometimes he found a second link passing anchor text, though in the majority of cases Google seems to prefer the first link. Dan's suggestion about running a variety of tests not just setting up one test page also applies here, since Googlebot's decision process as to which links get dropped involves more factors than we thought. With a single test, those factors can't be isolated.

from Harith 41 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

Matt traditional reply would be:

I can neither confirm nor deny that ......   :-)

from graywolf 41 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

the answer to the question is definitely maybe ...

and is these kind of non answers that drive me crazy ... sigh

from neyne 41 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

yeah, in some cases google behaves according to the scenario you didn't ask about... gee thanks.
It is a politician's answer. Either say you cannot answer the question or don't say anything at all, but what is the point in answering the question you weren't asked ?

from hugoguzman 41 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

Hey, some feedback is better than none.

Question is, should we develop strategy to account for  value in the second link or just focus on the first?

I'm going to use the old "in case it works" philosophy and optimize second iterations of a link, but will make the first link a primary focus.

from tykeblog 41 days ago # - show/hide this comment
Votes: -1 | Vote:
+ -

Perhaps you should have drawn a diagram.

Back to picking my nose, which is quite good fun, now it's summer, the pollen count's up. I get those big scaley ones stuck to the side which are hard to get out, for a few minutes. :)


from imnotadoctor 41 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

ummm ... its so crystal clear now! Matt Cutts would rock at dodge ball!

from debram 41 days ago #
Votes: 1 | Vote:
+ -

Another answer on the blog boys and girls - allow me to share my interpretation:  Work for the answer. :)



http://thelinkspiel.blogspot.com/2008/07/calling-matt-cutts-to-bat-phone.html


from neyne 41 days ago #
Votes: 0 | Vote:
+ -

yep. he says that he is not confirming that the second anchor text will always pass value and says that it should be tested. Interesting


Log in to comment or register here.
Search Marketing Expo

Save the date for:
SMX China (Nanjing) - Sept. 23-24
SMX Stockholm - Sept. 23-24: See who's speaking or register now.
SMX East (New York City) - Oct. 6-8: See the agenda or register today and save!
SMX London - Nov. 4-5: Pre-agenda rate now available. Click here.