- 57
- Sphinn It!
Posted By: UtahSEOpro 358 days ago
Topic Type: News Story (Jump to http://www.shoemoney.com)
Category: Social Media
9 Comments
9 Comments
Save the date for:
SMX Singapore - July 2-3, 2009
SMX São Paulo - August 4-5
SMX East - October 5-7, 2009
SMX Stockholm - 12-13 October, 2009
SMX Mexico - November 11, 2009
Learn more about search marketing through free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site Search Marketing Now.
Comments
The original post from PopFail was informative, but all Shoemoney added was that the list included some SEOs. He doesn't provide specifics nor does he identify what percentage of the submits the SEOs controlled. I could've written the exact same article and switched out SEOs with "guys from the US" and provided as much insight...
whatever the case, his story got 3k diggs
@MikeDammann
Yeah I noticed the many Sphinns. And my comment wasn't meant to be a general statement about Shoemoney. I just though this particular article from him was weak and it feels like he had more he wanted to say, but just didn't.
Perhaps Google can penalize DIGG now. After all it does not use the nofollow. In fact, Google might apply a penalty to all social bookmarking sites, even SPHINN...
Should probably note that Shoemoney's blog is not the post that was submitted to Digg and not the post that got 3k diggs...
Attention to detail folks.
@seobro
Why would Google give a penalty to sites that require user voting and moderation to reach a front page?
Isn't it against Digg's TOS to use the Digg button of another page? Anyways, Shoemoney is a dirty lowlife exposing Maki and the others as SEOs. Everybody knows that Digg hates SEOs. Maki is just a blogger who happaned to be active on Sphinn. He's not even a real SEO doing client work or something.
Shoemoney does not add any value whatsoever, so he only brags and offends to get attention.
@BrentCsutoras Good catch on the misused Digg button! Now Shoemoney's post is even more useless than I originally claimed :-)
Shoemoney using the Digg button of the original story probably only helped that story go popular (or become more popular) so I don't think that's exactly a "lowlife" thing to do.
However, I do think saying some of them were SEOs was pointless. I'm not sure what his motivation there is.
With all that being said, I don't think it will have much effect on any of those submitters. Many digg users already have a fairly vocal hatered of the top users so I'm betting these 10 won't notice any ill effects.