Microsoft tries to one-up Google PageRank

Sorry this site requires JavaScript to be enabled in your browser. See the following guide on How to enable JavaScript in Internet Explorer, Netscape, Firefox and Safari. Alternatively you may be blocking JavaScript with an advert-related or developer plugin. Please check your browser plugins.

57
Sphinn It!

Went Hot: Jul 26, 2008 - 09:36 am
Posted By: soulfood 563 Days ago
Source: http://news.cnet.com
Category: SEO

A great article about Microsoft Browserank, a pagerank alternative from Microsoft.

Although I am not in alignment that Google doesn’t use any user behavior data as the article implies.

6 Comments

Comments

from chartwell 563 Days ago #

Votes: 0

If user behavior is such a great indicator of importance, why do Microsoft’s search results suck so bad?

from wolf 563 Days ago #

Votes: 0

The FAROO P2P Search Engine has been doing this for some time already. FAROO’s "If users spend a long time on a page, visit it often, put it to bookmarks or print it out, this page goes up in ranking."sounds very familiar to Microsoft’s"The more visits of the page made by the users and the longer time periods spent by the users on the page, the more likely the page is important." doesn’t it?A very significant difference is though, that FAROO maintains the privacy of the user because it calculates the PeerRank in a decentralized manner, while Microsoft would collect all click streams of all users in a central server.It’s great to see that Microsoft research paper confirms that attention based ranking is able to outperform PageRank both for relevancy and for spam suppression.

from tinotriste 561 Days ago #

Votes: 0

Just another haven for spammers!

from DarrenSlatten 560 Days ago #

Votes: 2

I read the BrowseRank paper yesterday, and I was very annoyed by it. I have read dozens of academic research papers about PageRank, TrustRank, IR, Machine Learning, etc., and this BrowseRank paper was the first one I’ve read that seemed to be deliberately critical of PageRank. Maybe I was just biased because I knew this work came from researchers at Microsoft, but I could’ve sworn that this paper had some "Microsoft is better than Google" undertones. Did anyone else catch that?In any case... the BrowseRank algorithm is a joke, in my opinion. I think this whole idea was flawed, the moment these researchers made the assumption that users spend more time on important pages. Even if BrowseRank DID outperform PageRank in ranking documents (which I think is debatable), there is a mountain of problems it would have to overcome, before it could be implemented.First of all... it requires users to opt-in to browser tracking features, which I can’t imagine being available on anything other than I.E.Second of all... it rewards pages that keep users the longest! The researchers who wrote this paper kept mentioning how easy it is to manipulate links to inflate PageRank, but what about BrowseRank’s potential for abuse? How about these for some new SEO best-practices:Make information difficult to find.Use a non-intuitive navigation structure.Every form field requires a CAPTCHA.Use frames to display all content through the home page URL.Build sites that are 100% Flash (same URL).AJAX everything!Build pages that take forever to load.Maximize the use of Flash and JavaScript pop-ups, to prevent users from leaving.Every page should have a 30-second Flash intro that users can’t skip.Every link opens a page in a new tab.Every image a user mouses over will open 5 landing pages in pop-unders.Make sure that every page on your site displays your home page in a hidden iframe.etc.I don’t know... BrowseRank just seems like yet another failed attempt to be better than PageRank. I mean honestly... the BrowseRank algorithm chose MySpace as the single most important site on the Web? I’m sorry, but I just can’t accept the idea of web page importance being influenced by 100 million teenagers with too much time on their hands.

from azakers 560 Days ago #

Votes: 1

"...seemed to be deliberately critical of PageRank." & "..."Microsoft is better than Google" undertones. Did anyone else catch that?"Absolutely - unbelievably transparent too. I’m seeing more and more of that from Microsoft - like Steven Ball today saying that Yahoo wasn’t a factor anymore - it’s a two horse race (meaning Microsoft & Google).. to me the ignorant arrogance is actually kinda funny."...it requires users to opt-in to browser tracking features, which I can’t imagine being available on anything other than I.E."Yet another example of Microsofts sense of self importance out ranking their sense of self preservation"..I just can’t accept the idea of web page importance being influenced by 100 million teenagers with too much time on their hands."MySpace, the single most important piece of cyberspace real estate..? C’mon Microsoft, get your head in the game.