Published: Jul 29, 2008 - 08:09 pm
Story Found By: DavidWallace 1293 Days ago
Category: SEM
5 Comments
5 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Trust is valued in communities, including internet commmunities, and people have observed this since the late 90s. The newer social media properties are no different. Everyone knows there are fakes on the internet. I mean, duh.I guess Lisa Barones saying, and I agree, that the intent and action of the avatar matters, too. Ronald McDonald isnt real, but thats OK because everyone knows he represents McDonalds. Some normal-seeming person who really loves McDonalds hamburgers might be OK, too, but if that person were paid by McDonalds to hype their product, that would be deceptive and upsetting to the community.Its like when journalists disclose monetary relationships with their subjects: if they dont disclose any money ties and the relationship comes out, they risk losing credibility.What about the fake persona who doesnt hype a product, or who even disses it?A couple years ago I posted on the searchenginewatch.com forums under the name "hutcheson" and pretended to be an Open Directory editor lamenting the decline of that directory. Now there is an ODP editor who uses the handle hutcheson and who was vocal on messageboards (although not that one.) I hoped that people would think my post was from him. My action was a prank, a bit of culture-jamming. In some sense my action was like that of "Katie Cake" in Lisas example because I intentionally deceived people. But in another sense, I wasnt trying to sell anything, and the readers of that forum were surely savvy enough to doubt messageboard posts.My post did, however, undermine trust (and it was rightly removed) - thats what pranks do. I dont think anyone who has spent more than a few months on the internet is surprised that these things happen, though. The web is full of fakes. The real world is full of fakes. Check out the Orson Welles movie "F for Fake" sometime.
Theres clearly a difference between creating fake personas to game social media websites and the examples of Obama and GoogleGuy.
This topic has moved to twitter. Wish it was here as there is some really great discussion going on.
I think "fake" is entirely the wrong word to use. Every personal online identity is an artificial projection. Everything from the choice of username, avatar, personal picture, tone of posting, etc. Does no one believing this is something that can be better managed?Arguing the ethics I think remains a distraction - I think there are plenty of positive ways in which multiple identities can be created in order to better engage different user groups. You can be constructively creative.While I havent been creating social media profiles as yet, Ive already been long in planning a strategy on using multiple aliases to project very different interests. 2c.
I dont agree with using fake avatars..coz for me, it is very important to gain your fellow netizens..^^ If you will not use your own profile..it simply shows that you are keeping something.