News Source: http://www.blogstorm.co.uk
Published: Aug 04, 2008 - 11:31 am
Story Found By: tomcritchlow 3271 Days ago
Category: SEO
12 Comments
Sorry this site requires JavaScript to be enabled in your browser. See the following guide on How to enable JavaScript in Internet Explorer, Netscape, Firefox and Safari. Alternatively you may be blocking JavaScript with an advert-related or developer plugin. Please check your browser plugins.
News Source: http://www.blogstorm.co.uk
Published: Aug 04, 2008 - 11:31 am
Story Found By: tomcritchlow 3271 Days ago
Category: SEO
12 Comments
Upcoming Conferences
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Latest News From Marketing Land
- Why data is at the center of leadership shakeups in retail
- Amazon’s new Spark social feed wants to be ‘Instagram for products’
- Facebook lets brands, publishers connect Groups to their Pages
- Organizing for Martech: Re-examining modern marketing
- Time is almost up. Attend MarTech at the lowest price possible – don’t miss out!
- - See more news at Marketing Land -
Upcoming Webcasts
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Digital Marketing Depot. Upcoming online events include:
- Organizing for Martech: Re-examining modern marketing structure - Aug 15
- Baby Come Back! How to Grow Customer Revenue with People-Based Search Marketing - Jun 15
- Mobile Marketing vs. In-Store Sales: Help! What’s the Correlation? - Jun 6
- New RLSA Strategies for Search Marketers - May 25
- Start Listening! 7 Real-World Tips for Better Social Engagement - May 23
Research:
- Enterprise Social Media Management Software: A Marketer’s Guide
- Enterprise Call Analytics Platforms: A Marketer’s Guide
- B2B Marketing Automation Platforms: A Marketer’s Guide
- Video Marketing Software: A Marketer’s Guide
- Enterprise SEO Platforms: A Marketer’s Guide
Whitepapers:
- 7 Inbound Marketing Service Ideas to Grow Your Agency
- PPC Bid Management Guide
- The Marketer’s Guide to Driving ROI From Facebook Advertising
- Collaborative Customer Interactions Management
- How To Create a Data-Driven Dynasty
Latest News From Search Engine Land
- Google Search Analytics report now breaks down job listings & details results
- Amazon Prime Day’s surprising effects on Google AdWords performance
- SearchCap: Right to be forgotten, Google Analytics questions & Search Console changes
- Three ways local businesses can survive the on-demand threat
- Merkle: Google paid search spend up 23% in Q2, thanks to non-brand text & shopping ads
- - See more news at Search Engine Land -
Comments
Really interesting little idea.Definitely an element of ’gaming’ SE’s here, so it would be interesting to see how it would be viewed.Additionally, even with a link to the correct website, if it was my URL that was being hijacked (maybe a harsh term, but not overly wide of the mark), I’d be less than happy I think.As someone on the blog writes, need a bit of time to digest how it could be used.
Good stuff. Removing the www can also vary the results.
The example is a litle sneaky, you can do that 100% white hat too.
Methods like this are especially potent when the legitimate number 1 result is spiced up with a "This site may harm your computer" message, and nobody dares to click on it.
Interesting. I’d like to see a non sneaky example like onreact mentions.
Just seems a little too spammy for my tastes. Anything that takes SERP spots away from more relevant results seems exploitative to me. How many of the visitors thought it was a worthwhile click?Sphunn for making me think.
I don’t see how this is spammy or sneaky.For a URL search, there are at most 2 really relevant results (the actual URL + a close match from the same domain as an indented result). Perhaps 4 good results, if there is an alternative URL (subdomain instead of directory, or something like that).The rest of the SERP is up for grabs.It’s Google’s search engine. They could easily decide that because there is only one perfect result for a URL search, they show only one result instead of ten. Then this "trick" wouldn’t work. But they still choose to show 10 results, so what’s wrong with getting in there among those 10?
I do think this is a little deceptive for natural search, but I use competitor domains as keywords in my PPC campaigns. That way, my competitor’s organic listing will still be there for the consumer to find, but they may also want to check out the alternative I offer in PPC ads.
How is it not spammy? It’s designed purely for the search engines and not the visitor. It provides no useful relevance to the visitor’s query, despite claiming it does by making claims that are just plain untrue (offering a discount on taxdiscs). It relies on tricking users into detouring through Patrick’s site while gaining no value on the way (unless their shopping list that morning was "replace tax disc, find new SEO services").As far as SEO goes, I’m the novice and many of you are the experts, and I’m a big fan of Patrick’s stuff. But if it smells like bacon and carves like a loaf, I’m guessing its spam without waiting for Matt Cutts to show me the tin.Happy to hear why it isn’t, cause otherwise it’s brilliantly clever.
I haven’t tried this one...I might as well give it a try..anyways thanks for sharing.
Kimota - The use of this on my site was merely an illustration, if you rank for a url your biggest competitor has been promoting offline then you should be able to figure out a way to offer them value.And even with the example on my site the visitors couldn’t find the link without my help so I’m guessing they went away happy.
Great idea, can’t imagine the bounce rate is below 70%