Published: Aug 07, 2008 - 04:57 am
Story Found By: yourseomentor 1751 Days ago
Category: Link Building
19 Comments
19 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:


Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Digital Marketing Depot. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Great piece."Convincing web site owners that they need to create and promote content on an ongoing basis outside of their brochureware corporate site or online product catalog"That can be a challenge. Some people just do not get it, probably not because the idea is complicated but because they want things easy. Directory/article submissions are easy and cheap (you get what you pay for); coming up with memorable service/content/tools is hard (and rewarding). Some people confuse creative content creation with charity. They dont see the point. Looking at their competitors backlinks, they think all a site needs is a few more on-topic links to nail #1 rankings, so why sink money and time into content that isnt even designed to convert?The truth is if youre looking for an SEO short cut, content promotion is it.
All websites need content, but blogs are one of the few website forms that require a rather constant rate of content creation, which should preclude their use by people with a full agenda.In other words, not all types of websites need constant content creation for ranking well in Google.
I keep hearing about the need to update content, yet I see blogs with the last post made in 2006 rank for some pretty competitive keyphrases.
The point of this post is not so much about ongoing creation of content, although if a company has something to say thats always a good idea. Its about promoting content to attract links rather than relying solely on manual link requests and similar linking tactics.If a company puts in the effort to create a web site then why not market and promote information of value to their communities of prospects? Its that simple.
Fantastic post, Lee. True thought leadership.
Isnt promoting content to attract links the definition of link building? I agree with the article, not particularly with the Sphinn title.
Its an interesting peice, but I think too many people will walk away cheering "content is king!" when I think Lee is simply making the point that "marketing is king".As Lyndon Antcliff made a point of recently, link baiting doesnt require good content - it requires exceptional content.Content has never been king unless it could be directly promoted in front of an audience - usually that meant direct link building, Lee talks of indirect link building. But thinking content will sell itself is a half-cocked measure IMO.2c.
@iBrian YES! marketing is king. Great content + great promotion = great links
"too many people will walk away cheering "content is king!""Yeah, I hear too many people saying "I publised 1000 pages of "original" content but Googles not crawling my site."But whether marketing or content is "king" is an empty debate. Clearly, a great product will eventually win the long game; and without something to sell theres nothing to market. Yet if you dont market and theres no word of mouth no one will find what youre selling. Marketers will all tell you marketing is king which is as much BS as the flip side of publishing 1000 pages of "original" content.Bottom line its easier to gain visibility, eyeballs (and links) by attracting bees with honey - to take Lyndons words - than trying to talk a bee into flying in your direction. Debra M also recently wrote a post about the importance of creative incentives in link building. Without incentives, link building is tough. Compelling content gives people that incentive. Its a marketers strongest weapon.
I guess think of "Content" as Geico insurance and "Content Promotion" as a Caveman commercial. Traditional link building is calling up people on the phone asking to switch to Geico.
Gee, this brouhaha has been going on for years. Content is king. Links are king. Blah blah blah. Geez - anything really new? The idea is still the same - building SOMETHING to attract links; be it written content, widgets, or whatever - something to gain links. But LINKS are what drives traffic, PageRank, and ultimately - SERP rankings. I cant believe this is still being promoted as if something new. Nothings changed. Tactics have changed or expanded, but its still the same. You have more options with content now - video, podcasts (boy, that really sounds like an old term now), widgets, content, etc. But links are still king.
"Compelling content gives people that incentive. Its a marketers strongest weapon."Nuff said.
I think the important point isnt simply to build - but to promote.It was only a few years ago that people in SEO would say that content was all important and that links had only limited value (seriously). "Build and they will come..."But if you build, unless you have a marketing channel, they wont come because they cant find you. It used to be the case that you would need links, but in the modern world of SMO, link building can be more indirect. Which I think is the point Lee was trying to underline.EDIT: Thats just a general pointer on this thread, and not a direct response to Lee - he knows what hes talking about. :)
Content is King. Link Building is Queen. Put them together and you got a Kingdom.
networking in general is king
I guess both is still equally ikmportant..it could be better if you have a great link building plan and a great content as well.
How about building links embedded into content?
links in content are best, but what works best if the link goes to an information page of the site with actually additional info on it
@JohnHGohde I hope you dont mind but I borrowed your king/queen kingdom thing for a blog post today :)