Published: Aug 15, 2008 - 02:44 pm
Story Found By: kevgibbo 1274 Days ago
Category: SEO
7 Comments
7 Comments
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Comments
Thanks for sphinning kevgibbo! Surprised there is no discussion on this. Everyone agrees? Disagrees? Dont care?
Sorry, kinda iffy on this one, was hoping for a surprise somewhere.Id say mistake 7 is depending too much on website fixes to lift a sites traffic, especially if a site is new and doesnt have a ton of backlinks, so that the effect of fixes wont be as dramatic as those on larger, more established sites. Not saying ignore it - a website should be reviewed at least once and early (preferably pre-launch, then once monthly after that) - just feel some people are reluctant to move beyond traditional site tweaks to increase visibility because compared to marketing (e.g. creating a compelling link magnet), stuff like tweaking TITLE tags and resolving canonical issues are cheap, quick, and easy.I had a client that insisnted in pouring 90% of his money and effort on site fixes because his home page TBPR was about equal to his competitor who was outranking him. I guess its tempting to believe just one SEO voodoo move like reducing keyword frequency or moving content below nav in HTML may make miracles happen because thats cheaper than several months of link building, "content" development, blogging, or social networking.90% of marketing budget should go to creating exceptional hooks and using them to pull eyeballs.
I was informed that doing re-direct from other domains counted against you. Is this true is some cases? We have other domains that we no longer use should we have them re-directed to our main site? Taking it further should be submit a sitemap to google?Simon.
"I was informed that doing re-direct from other domains counted against you. Is this true is some cases"It depends on your intent. See Matts comment here: http://www.wolf-howl.com/google/hey-matt-cutts-how-about-a-domain-redirection-and-consolidation-post/"If you buy typos, I’d 301 them to your main site. Even things that you win in UDRP arbitration can be 301′ed. For example, if someone bought porngoogle.com and Google won it in UDRP, it would make sense to 301 it to your main domain. What I *wouldn’t* recommend is try to register unrelated expired domains in an attempt to get those pre-existing links to count toward your domain. I would also avoid registering-and-301′ing typos of competitors’ domains or other completely unrelated domains."The main question is are you redirecting to preserve traffic and/or consolidating PageRank across multiple versions of the same site... or are you redirecting as a form of link building?I would not submit a sitemap of a site that is no longer updating. One reason you want to submit a sitemap to Google is to help them spot brand new pages. If a domain is stale, Google most likely already knows every single URL.
I ahvent really realized that Im actually some of the mistakes as well..anyways thanks a bunch for sharing!
"I was informed that doing re-direct from other domains counted against you. Is this true is some cases"When domain name changed after we started developing the site, after some keyword research. So we changed the name. So the other domain is dead, and robots.txt is disallow all. Reading :http://www.wolf-howl.com/google/hey-matt-cutts-how-about-a-domain-redirection-and-consolidation-post/The domain no longer is use should 301 to live domain.
Oh man Bao... this aint the place to drop lame comment spam. Goodbye.[Mod: Thx James, lame comment spam removed]